Cane Ridge is home to the first ‘green’ subdivision in the state

Monday, March 31, 2008 at 12:10am

A 20-acre piece of land in Cane Ridge that served as a battleground between developers and neighboring residents is being converted into the state of Tennessee’s first green-certified subdivision.

Franklin developer Randy Chastain, who owns Parkside Homes, will break ground on Cambridge Park next week. Cambridge Park will be a 77-home development in which each house will meet the U.S. Green Building Council’s Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED) certification.

“Future homeowners are going to have a certified piece of paper to have and to show to future buyers that says, ‘Look, this is LEED-certified. It was built with the highest certification standards,’” Chastain said.

LEED certification takes into account energy conservation, materials used during the building process and the environmental effect the homes will have on the property. The Cambridge Park homes will be in the range of $230,000 to $290,000, Chastain said.

Joe Cooper works on behalf of EcoSouth and is in charge of LEED certification for much of the Southeast, including Nashville. Cooper said there are other LEED-certified homes and private businesses in Nashville, but Cambridge Park is the first ‘green’ subdivision in the state.

Chastain said the advantage to green homes goes beyond using the LEED certification to improve resale value.

“In this time of… rising fuel costs and energy bills, people want new ways to save money,” Chastain said. “We feel like this is the future.”

The Cambridge Park development is a happy ending to a four-year-long affair that District 31 Councilman Parker Toler called “a terrible mess.”

Toler said the residents along Barnes Road wanted a development that made sense for their neighborhood. The property had passed through the hands of four potential developers who dreamed up uses from commercial property to bed and breakfasts.

“On this one piece of property, I must have had about 18 meetings with the neighbors,” Toler said. “This was a big issue to everyone for a number of years.”

It took five more meetings among Toler, Chastain and neighbors before everyone was on board to move forward with Cambridge Park.

“I agree with Councilman Toler this was a collective effort of working together between the developer, the neighbors and their [Metro Council member],” Chastain said. “Too often in our business, developers don’t take the time to talk to the neighborhoods.”

Besides constructing the first green subdivision in the state, Chastain agreed to widen 1,300 feet of Barnes Road at his own expense.

“That was an agreement we worked out with Councilman Toler in order to make this work,” Chastain said. “Seeing as though we were the developer and the builder, we weren’t presenting the neighbors with a hypothetical. We could show them plans of what we were going to do and specifically explain to them what we would do to meet their concerns about density and other issues.”

Last month, Metro Council authorized the formation of the Green Permit Task Force. The purpose of the task force is to find a process, either LEED or another green-certification provider, which will allow future developments to have paperwork filed with Metro Codes verifying their building as green.

Chastain said adopting green standards will likely become mandatory for developers in the future, so doing so in advance just makes sense.

“We’re talking about homes that take a holistic approach in everything from how they’re framed, to the windows to the appliances they use, so they conserve energy and are completely sustainable,” Chastain said.

Filed under: City News
Tagged:
By: WickedTribe on 12/31/69 at 7:00

Did I read that right? They're going to fit 77 homes onto 20 acres?

By: frogmild on 12/31/69 at 7:00

77 houses on 20 acres must be relying on body heat instead solar panels. I think this is a great solution for those want to be there now it they will just leave the rest of us alone.

By: mccullochd on 12/31/69 at 7:00

Wow, that is a tight fit...guess you won't have to destory the ozone by mowing your grass.

By: NewYorker1 on 12/31/69 at 7:00

Good morning babies.77 homes on 20 acres is called greed. I will bet my life savings that this developer's house isn't that close to his neighbors. It would seem the city would step in and reject that proposal because of fire hazards. I can only imagine that if one house was to catch on fire the entire subdivision would be destroyed.Oh well, regardless, I'm still beautiful.

By: revo-lou on 12/31/69 at 7:00

The less land that is used, the better. That the effort is being made to minimize the impact of new construction, and that efforts are being made for long term value is what is important here, and anywhere else, that construction is going on. The builder is to be applauded, not bemoaned.

By: TITAN1 on 12/31/69 at 7:00

A lot subdivisions the houses sit on less than a 1/4 acre, this is nothing new.

By: tjfree on 12/31/69 at 7:00

I thought those lot sizes were pretty good. I have a decent size house and a decent yard and my lot is only .17 acre as opposed to the .26 acres this subdivision will have. Not sure some folks realize what most lot sizes are in most subdivisions.

By: mccullochd on 12/31/69 at 7:00

Each lot will need to be about .25 of an acre for the math to work out. I don't see many people who would pay $300K for .25 of an acre in Antioch....I mean, Cane Ridge.

By: gdiafante on 12/31/69 at 7:00

You'd be surprised. It's not the size of the land anymore, it's the size of the house.

By: mccullochd on 12/31/69 at 7:00

How big of a house do you plan putting on .25 of an acre? Keep in mind, you'll need a driveway and some place for the kids to play.

By: gdiafante on 12/31/69 at 7:00

There is a new subdivision near Cane Ridge that the houses are right on top of each other, no driveways, just wide roads and a community park for the kiddies. It's really ugly and I can't see why anyone would want to live there, but there are plenty of "sold" signs.

By: revo-lou on 12/31/69 at 7:00

It would most likely be a little less than a quarter acre, as roads, utilities right of ways, storm water runoff, etc. take up some room. Not sure what the zoning is, but it most lots will probably be 10k sq ft. They may even be zero lot line with a common green area. Of course the more that is charged for the house, the better the area becomes. Not to much “riff-raff” can swing a note on a 300k house.

By: gdiafante on 12/31/69 at 7:00

No the "riff-raff" are relegated to cardboard townhomes on the other side of the tracks.

By: NewYorker1 on 12/31/69 at 7:00

I LOVE living in Green Hills. I live in an older subdivision, but the homes are well kept. There's enough space between my neighbors to have privacy and close enough to be social. After growing up in New York City, I've grown to really appreciate having land and a garden that I can work in. I absolutely LOVE gardening now. I never imagined me in a garden, but I have a few cute gardening outfits and a little belt to put all my little tool thingies in. I wish it was nice outside so that I could work in the garden today and then sit back with a fire going in the outdoor fire place and sip on a lovely cocktail.

By: Fundit on 12/31/69 at 7:00

When I first saw two (sometimes three!) houses being put in on single family lots, I wondered who in their right mind would pay for such a weird configuration. Now five or so years later in my neighborhood such monstrosities are going for $700 g - and up. Location, location, location...NY1, this IS nice for Nashville. Why I've been in my cute flowery muck boots all day scooping weird slimy stuff out of the pond. Enjoy it now while it's bearable. Remember 100 degrees in August?

By: Fundit on 12/31/69 at 7:00

BTW, I just wish developers would adopt decent building standards before they worry about the environment. Most of the houses in Horseshoe Bend have hollow doors, snap in window panes, plastic tub surrounds, brick veneer and thin drywall. Yet buyers fork out the big bucks to live there. They need to learn how to recognize the cheap crap and stop paying an arm and a leg for it. So many contractors are on the take and building and codes people wouldn't know a good roof from bad. It's alarming.

By: NewYorker1 on 12/31/69 at 7:00

Fundit, you're right. That's why I say, buy an older home if you can. One that has been taken care of. Older homes have more character to them and IMO where built to withstand the elements better. If you can find an older home that has been updated, you are better off. Most older homes already have hardwood floors. Add a new roof, new central air and heating, new kitchen and restrooms, new appliances, and update the lighting and you are good to go. When I go into some of these new homes, they just don't feel safe. If seems like if a heavy wind comes through, it's going to blow them away. They have absolutely no character, unless you are buying on the high end.

By: willtw on 12/31/69 at 7:00

Unsure whether this community is the same but across the street from this GREEN community is a tract, formerly a ravine, top filled with soil from Maryland Farms (hundreds of loads) of dirt which would not compact in MF....Guess what? If it didn't compact there, WHY must anyone assume it will compact on Barnes Road????? Hopefully, this new little neighborhood, across from this builder is not associated with them but curbs, underground are already in...let's see what collapses first, the homes to be built there or the person(s) who seek to build there!!!!