Corker touts ‘Gang of 10’ energy initiative

Wednesday, August 6, 2008 at 12:07am
Sen. Bob Corker

U.S. Sen. Bob Corker was at Lipsomb University Tuesday touting his involvement with the “Gang of 10,” a bipartisan group of United States senators that has banded together and proposed new energy legislation.

The group is a bipartisan coalition led by Kent Conrad (D-N.D.) and Saxby Chambliss (R-Ga.). In addition to Corker, it also includes John Thune (R-S.D.), Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.), Blanche Lincoln (D-Ark.), Mary Landrieu (D-La.), Johnny Isakson (R-Ga.), Mark Pryor (D-Ark.), and Ben Nelson (D-Neb.).

They have introduced legislation that they feel will "reduce gas prices, lessen our nation's dependence on foreign oil, and strengthen America's economy."

Called the "Comprehensive New Energy Reform Act of 2008," the legislation has three main components: An "intensive effort to transition vehicles to non-petroleum based fuels, a robust federal commitment to conservation and energy efficiency, and targeted responsible domestic production of energy resources."

Corker expanded on those points Tuesday, saying the reason he thinks the plan will succeed is because it has bipartisan support. He noted that, hours after the first draft of the plan was unveiled last week, Democratic presidential candidate and Senate colleague Barack Obama changed his energy position on offshore drilling.

Obama said that he would consider offshore drilling as long as it was part of a larger, more comprehensive plan that would decrease our nation's dependence on foreign energy.

In the plan co-authored by Corker, offshore drilling would be concentrated in areas like the Gulf Coast and the Atlantic seaboard where there is already infrastructure in place. It also would establish a 50-mile coastal buffer zone where new oil production is not allowed.

In a nod to Democrats in the "Gang of 10" who support offshore drilling, Corker and his Republican colleagues have called for the closing of a tax loophole. That loophole, called Section 199, has been a significant benefit to oil companies. According to Corker, when the section was placed in the federal code, it was not meant to do so and by closing the loop it would pay for other aspects of the bipartisan energy proposal.

Other components of the plan include extending the renewable energy and energy efficiency tax incentives through 2012, introducing consumer tax credits up to $2,500 to purchase "highly efficient vehicles," and launching significant investments for research and development into next-generation biofuels and infrastructure.

Corker added that finding new energy solutions is vital by pointing out that the United States has 4 percent of the world's population and 3 percent of its oil, but uses 25 percent of world oil production.

When asked if the "Gang of 10" plan would affect prices at the pump, Corker said if adopted, this initiative would "immediately affect households." He said that the price of oil is largely based upon speculative and political factors.

"If the president of Iran got up to today and said nice things, the price of oil would drop. If he wakes up and does some saber rattling, it will increase."

Filed under: City News
Tagged:
By: Jagman on 12/31/69 at 7:00

Corker is a joke. That is a joke with enough money to purchase a Senate seat.

By: Dragon on 12/31/69 at 7:00

Pelosi as assured everyone that she will block any legislation on offshore drilling until after the election. Check back with her in January.

By: vejaneksela on 12/31/69 at 7:00

70% of americans want drilling. Congress and the senate need to start listening to their constituents and quit playing Mom and Dad, doing what they think is best for us. Of course, expensive gas doesn't effect them, so they don't care.

By: Kosh III on 12/31/69 at 7:00

In addition to conservation measures, we need to aggressively pursue alternate sources of energy, especially the one never mentioned: fusion. It is a long term solution because the R&D for fusion may cost as much as 6 months in Iraq, but it will be worth it. There are already feasible prototypes in the works, Dr. Bussard had a good method but could not get the huge amounts of money needed to make it commercially feasible.

By: Dragon on 12/31/69 at 7:00

How will solar, wind, etc. make a difference sooner? Cars don't run on solar and wind. Only 1.6% of our electricity is produced using petroleum.Maybe you subscribe to Pickens' proposal to run cars on natural gas. Why not just fill your trunk with bottles of propane?Petroleum can not be replaced with electricity. Get a clue.

By: gdiafante on 12/31/69 at 7:00

It is amusing how some get so excited to debunk ANY idea that doesn't conform to their political beliefs (Dragon).

By: Dragon on 12/31/69 at 7:00

dgiafante - can you explain how solar and wind makes a difference in the price of gasoline "sooner"? You might even read the plan. I'm sure you'll love the billions of dollars for an Apollo-like project to invent new technologies. At least they didn't say a Manhattan-like project.http://corker.senate.gov/public/index.cfm?FuseAction=Files.View&FileStore_id=0037ac2e-47e4-4607-a8d6-68ba11efb578

By: vejaneksela on 12/31/69 at 7:00

Don't forget unintended consequences. If we switch to electric cars (ones that plug in, not batteries) we would have to build more power stations because our current amount of electricity available could never cover that many cars. Plus, increase demand makes it more expensive. Drilling for oil right now will decrease gas right now, due to speculation. It will drop the second this legislation gets passed. Alternative energy sources aren't going to lower prices, I just think both plans can be pursued.

By: vejaneksela on 12/31/69 at 7:00

This whole thing is not about saving the earth, as Pelosi has stated. I am really annoyed at politicians, like Obama, Pelosi, and other global warming proponents telling me that I can't go on a family vacation, but they can jump on a private jet, go throughout the country, emitting CO2 everywhere. They put out more CO2 in a month then us "little people" do in years.