Crafton on English Only issue: ‘No mas’

Friday, January 23, 2009 at 12:00am

On the heels of a sound defeat in the English Only special election on Thursday, Eric Crafton called for unity on the key issues facing Nashville, while also refusing to speculate on his own political future.

Crafton, the District 22 Metro Council member and the top supporter of English Only, said it was his hope Nashville could harness the passion it displayed for the special election to face down issues like the struggling public school system and the coming Metro budget crunch.

“I just hope people can not make this about personalities and agree to move forward,” Crafton said after losing by a margin of 56 percent to 44 percent in the English Only special election. “Those people who voted for it, like we did, we need to come together with the people who voted against and basically double our efforts for the upcoming issues like the failing education system and the budget crisis. We need to take this talent and energy and we need to energize on the issues.”

Crafton said he was going to abide by the will of Nashville’s voters and put the English issue to bed for good.

“In the immortal words of [boxer] Roberto Duran vs. Sugar Ray Leonard, ‘No mas,’” Crafton said when asked whether he would keep the issue alive.

Out-raised about 5-to-1 by the opposition, Crafton said he was proud of the job his Nashville English First committee did. Although the committee still has yet to file a financial disclosure, Crafton said the group raised about $60,000.

The opposition group raised about $300,000 according to its financial disclosures. Mayor Karl Dean was the most vocal critic of English Only, but other leaders including Gov. Phil Bredesen also spoke out against it.

“Our gathering was in my den, the opposition’s gathering was at the Vanderbilt Loew’s plaza,” Crafton said. “That’s a nice picture. I think we did a great job with the resources we had available.

“We made them go to the mat, and we made the mayor call in markers and the governor come down from the capitol.”

While some have speculated Crafton would use the name recognition gained by the English Only issue to run for a higher office some day, he declined to speculate on his political future after the measure was defeated.

“I don’t know [what I’ll do in the future]. I enjoy being on the Metro Council,” Crafton said. “Obviously I’m term limited out [in 2011]. I think if I said I wanted to hold another office, my wife and mom might kill me so I’m not going to think about it.

“I love my city. It’s the greatest place in the world. I’ve lived all over the world, serving my country [in the Navy] and chose to move back here. And I’m going to continue what I can do to make this the best place it can be.”

Filed under: City News
Tagged:
By: Captain Nemo on 12/31/69 at 7:00

Nashville wins!Crafton Zero.

By: eggers on 12/31/69 at 7:00

There is a saying that is befitting to the majority of Nashville voters that rejected “English First” proposal: “Stupid is what Stupid does”.I had lived most of my life in Los Angeles County where early on in my youth English was the expected and dominant language. Today the situation is an absolute mess there where as an American I feel like a stranger in my own country where many billboards and business signs are in different languages that I can’t read or understand, and moreover, in public places numerous languages are freely spoken that are foreign to me. In that western part of the USA, it’s a Babylonian Tower of Babel gone wild.This situation brings to mind the haunting admonition and sage advice of Senator S.I. Hayakawa (1906 – 1992) that decades later still clearly rings so true. However before relating it, here’s an insightful brief bio of this highly perceptive and brilliant man who clearly understood the necessity and importance of ‘one country – one language’.Samuel Ichiye Hayakawa was born in Vancouver, Canada. After completing high school in Winnipeg, in 1927 he received a B.A. in English from the University of Manitoba and year later a M.A. in English from McGill University in Montreal. In 1930, he became a graduate assistant at the University of Wisconsin, where in 1935 he received a Ph.D. in English and American Literature.However, the mid-point of the 1950s was a watershed year for Dr. Hayakawa where he became naturalized U.S. citizen. It was also in 1955 that he became a professor of English at San Francisco State College, where he would rise to the rank of President of the College in 1968. During his tenure, he was revered for his dedication to academics and maintaining business as usual during those tumultuous social times. In 1973, Hayakawa was given the title President Emeritus of the then renamed San Francisco State University. Throughout Senator Hayakawa's long academic career he was best known as a semanticist, studying the history of language patterns and habits of thought. He wrote several internationally acclaimed books on semantics, including “Language in Thought and Action”.In 1976 Dr. Hayakawa was elected to the U.S. Senate. Because of his early years growing up in Canada where two designated official languages (English and French) compete and often socially divide that country, raised in an Asian sub-culture where Japanese language was privately spoken, and because of his extensive linguistics background and expertise, he was one of the first in Twentieth century America to clearly see the emergent need for and introduce the English Language Amendment. Concerned about the growing problems caused by the language barrier developing within America, Hayakawa founded the organization “U.S. ENGLISH” upon leaving the Senate in 1983. His intellectual stance then and till his death was, "Bilingualism for the individual is fine, but not for a country". Hayakawa always maintained that America should have a common and compulsory official language binding upon its citizens regardless where they had originated from. Smart man – smart advice!

By: idgaf on 12/31/69 at 7:00

Crafton has nothing to be ashamed of unlike Dean. (but he won't be)Thanks Eric, you fought the good fight.

By: yazoo on 12/31/69 at 7:00

If I recall properly, the predominant language in this continental landmass in 1492 was NOT English.

By: TITAN1 on 12/31/69 at 7:00

Yes Captain Nemo, Nashville did win! Now Crapton 0-2. We have the stadium and the Titans and this stupid amendment was defeated!

By: JDG on 12/31/69 at 7:00

Good job, Nashville, now all you have to do is figure out who to tax to pay for it.

By: TITAN1 on 12/31/69 at 7:00

I say send the bill to Crapton.

By: Captain Nemo on 12/31/69 at 7:00

If id says it so, then you can bank on it not being so.

By: BenDover on 12/31/69 at 7:00

Crafton's such a tool.

By: chiefpayne568 on 12/31/69 at 7:00

At least the people decided. Now, whatever happens for good or ill, they can credit or blame only themselves.So let it be written, so let it be done.

By: ycartrob on 12/31/69 at 7:00

That was easy

By: pandabear on 12/31/69 at 7:00

First of all,Congradulations to everyone who voted !I hear you eggars, although I don't thinkanyone else does.Thank you Eric for trying. 56% to 44% isnot much of a spread, it was pretty close.Considering that we spent 1/6 of what the opposition spent, and that we didn't have near the resources, I think this would passon a general election...Which is why they fought so hard to keep it off the general election.In the end, we got a chance to vote on it,and that's the good part.

By: chiefpayne568 on 12/31/69 at 7:00

Pandabear,And that was what my whole point was yesterday.Pass or fail, at least the people got to decide.

By: Fundit on 12/31/69 at 7:00

Now can we get started on recalling this clown? Any ideas? Is anyone else worried about what his cronies will come up with next? I am.

By: chiefpayne568 on 12/31/69 at 7:00

Fundit,You can always try...although I fail to see what he has done wrong. He put the question to a vote by the people...what was wrong with that?Shouldn't the voters who have to pay the taxes to support the tranlators and the additional instructions in various languages be allowed to decide if they wanted to have this done or not?

By: Captain Nemo on 12/31/69 at 7:00

Fundit:There are the Extra Terrestrials. They have been illegally living and working in the country for years.

By: frankbrown on 12/31/69 at 7:00

The Roman Empire lasted 1000 years. The United States of America should peter out at about 300 years

By: Captain Nemo on 12/31/69 at 7:00

That will give me enough to sell my house.

By: chiefpayne568 on 12/31/69 at 7:00

Frank,I think you give the US too much credit for staying power...at least as a recognizable republic.I figure we have about 30 - 40 years before we become a completely socialistic society.

By: producer2 on 12/31/69 at 7:00

Yesterday the proponents were guarenteeing victory, today the say they lost by a close vot. What was close about it? Now their mantra is "at least we got to vote" why? so the Nashville taxpayers can bear the burden of your stupidity! Wake up and smell the coffe, this is a Republic and that means you DO NOT get to vote on every pet project that comes up. The VAST majority did not want this and the polls proved that so quit wasting our time and money. The framework of our government is set up in a way that facilitates elected representatives doing most of our bidding. If your candidate did not win then too bad. MAJORITY RULES and once again it has played out that way in the voting booth. No excuses, no it was not close.

By: slacker on 12/31/69 at 7:00

Chief, in the 30 yrs. all the southwestern states will be governed by hispanic politicians.

By: revo-lou on 12/31/69 at 7:00

Crafton’s future? HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!

By: Fundit on 12/31/69 at 7:00

By: slacker on 1/23/09Chief, in the 30 yrs. all the southwestern states will be governed by hispanic politicians."What would be wrong with that?

By: chiefpayne568 on 12/31/69 at 7:00

Producer2,The point is, the people got to decide...you're right, Majority rules...WHEN they get to decide. So why are you so irritated? Your opinion won the day.BTW, 56% to 44% actually is pretty close you know.

By: chiefpayne568 on 12/31/69 at 7:00

Fundit,Not a problem as long as we can communicate. If the hispanic politician can speak English, no problem.Of course, therein lies the issue...if sufficient numbers of hispanic people who are US citizens and who refuse to learn English vote for a hispanic politician, why would he even bother to make speaches in English?

By: producer2 on 12/31/69 at 7:00

Because Chief, the "people" who decided did not need to have this on any ballot. It was clearly defeated meaning there was NO REASON for the vote to begin with. The "people" who started this campaign were unhappy with the elected officials for not seeing things "their way" so they drummed up this little ammendment (actually it was paid for by outside influences but that is for another day)to change things. Only problem is that the vast majority of people who voted and elected those officials still agree with them and defeated this bill. So what did we learn? Do we need a civics lesson here? The people already decided when they elected their officials and they agree with that so much that they defeated the second bill by an even wider margain to keep this kind of thing form happening more often. That is what we learned.

By: Blanketnazi2 on 12/31/69 at 7:00

"The Census Bureau's American Community Survey, taken between 2005 and 2007 for the Nashville metro area, shows a population of 613,632. Of that number, 61,843 were foreign-born, with most of the immigrants coming from Latin America.About 73,000 residents speak a language other than English at home and, of those, 35,290 speak English less than "very well," the survey found."that's a small percentage of the population.

By: slacker on 12/31/69 at 7:00

Fundit, I don't think the Mexican politicians, do such a terrific job governing Mexico, but maybe Obama will teach them the ropes. If not, they can keep sending their unemployed north until they find work in Canada. Eh....

By: BenDover on 12/31/69 at 7:00

Obama won 53% to 45% and it was called a landslide.

By: Blanketnazi2 on 12/31/69 at 7:00

i doubt hispanic politicians here in the U.S. would conduct business in the same manner as the Mexican gov't. how absurd!

By: slacker on 12/31/69 at 7:00

Crafton is gonna regret that 'No mas' quip.He will hear that daily for the next year.No one teased Duran about it, knowing he would beat the crap out of them.

By: slacker on 12/31/69 at 7:00

nazi, you are a good, kindhearted person, that wants the best for everyone. I like and respect you for that.BUT, the future politicians 30 yrs. from now , governing the southwest, will consider it to belong to Mexico, not the US.

By: Blanketnazi2 on 12/31/69 at 7:00

well, i don't know that i agree with that. i mean, AHNOLD is the governor of CA.

By: ptotaximom7 on 12/31/69 at 7:00

We spend $350,000 of taxpayer money on an election for a law that is already in place. Please read below... Conservatives & Liberals should be furious at this waste of money at a time of significant budget cuts. Nashville has spoken so lets put this issue to rest and move on! TENNESSEE CODE ANNOTATED, THROUGH 1993 SUPPLEMENT Section 4-1-404 –English and Legal Language (1984)English is hereby established as the official and legal language of Tennessee. All communications and publications, including ballots, produced by governmental entities in Tennessee shall be in English, and instruction in public schools and colleges of Tennessee shall be conducted in English unless the nature of the course would require otherwise.________________________________________Source: Charles V. Dale and Mark Gurevitz, Legal Analysis of Proposals to Make English the Official Language of the United States, Oct. 17, 1995, Washington, D.C.: Congressional Research Service.

By: chiefpayne568 on 12/31/69 at 7:00

Producer2,Ah but it was not clear that the majority saw it the way the politicians did and the minority followed the procedures to get it to a vote. The fact that the vote didn't go their way is irrelevant...they had the opportunity to have a vote of the people. It was their right to have that done.Everything was done per the rules.

By: chiefpayne568 on 12/31/69 at 7:00

Blanketnazi2,Of course hispanic politicians in the U.S. would conduct business in the US same manner.However, if the majority of their constituents speak Spanish, why would they bother making speeches in English? Just a thought.

By: Captain Nemo on 12/31/69 at 7:00

By: chiefpayne568 on 1/23/09BTW, 56% to 44% actually is pretty close you know.*********************************************Bush won by less than this and it was called a mandate.chief you are so funny.

By: Captain Nemo on 12/31/69 at 7:00

Spanish was spoken in the southwest befor English. Just a thought.cheif your still funny.

By: producer2 on 12/31/69 at 7:00

It was not clear to you but I am pretty sure that those who did not have their heads you know where were clear on their positions.More people probably voted against this because it is already the law (as stated above) and they were mad about this being unecessary and costly. My points exactly.

By: Captain Nemo on 12/31/69 at 7:00

By: ptotaximom7 on 1/23/09 We spend $350,000 of taxpayer money on an election for a law that is already in place. Please read below... Conservatives & Liberals should be furious at this waste of money at a time of significant budget cuts. Nashville has spoken so lets put this issue to rest and move on! *********************************************Crafton should be investigated.

By: Captain Nemo on 12/31/69 at 7:00

This bill was for show-boating only.

By: Blanketnazi2 on 12/31/69 at 7:00

remember when Bush made some speeches in Spanish during his tenure?

By: Blanketnazi2 on 12/31/69 at 7:00

By: chiefpayne568 on 1/23/09 Blanketnazi2,Of course hispanic politicians in the U.S. would conduct business in the US same manner.I bet similar comments were made when blacks started voting.

By: slacker on 12/31/69 at 7:00

I guess it will depend on how strong the La Raza movement is.

By: Captain Nemo on 12/31/69 at 7:00

slacker...lol

By: chiefpayne568 on 12/31/69 at 7:00

ptotaximom,Looking at the law you supplied, it says that all communications and publications will be in English...but it doesn't say ONLY in English. Thus, if put in English, Spanish, Japanese, and other languages, the letter of the law is still enforced.

By: Fundit on 12/31/69 at 7:00

Geez, it's a beautiful day! We have wonderful President! An awesome city! And it's Friday! I'm logging off and headed out to feel the love. Hope you guys are able to do the same!Au Revior!!

By: Captain Nemo on 12/31/69 at 7:00

LOL

By: SirKnight on 12/31/69 at 7:00

producer, until about 1970 Nashvillians were opposed to liquor by the drink. It was voted down repeatedly until finally the taxpayers voted FOR IT. Would you say it was a "waste of time" and therefore it should never have been brought up for a vote back then, as well??I doubt it.

By: BenDover on 12/31/69 at 7:00

Chief... you keep confusing the right to do something with whether we should do something. Clearly we should not have had this vote. It is a demonstrable waste of about a half million dollars for a special election that would have resulted in nothing even if it passed… plus about 73,896 wasted man-hours tied up in the wasted time of the voters. I'm happy to see it backfired on Crapton though. I really thought it would pass.