When a compromise was reached between AT&T, the cable industry and local governments over television franchising legislation two weeks ago, House Speaker Jimmy Naifeh made a simple request.
Naifeh (D-Covington), who was instrumental in forging the compromise, urged the parties involved to stop running advertisements bashing AT&T or the cable industry over the legislation, which AT&T says it needs to start offering television programming and competing with cable.
Tennesseans have been exposed to those ads — from both sides but primarily the cable industry — for a good portion of the past two years.
But despite the compromise legislation being agreed upon, the cable industry has continued to run advertisements during the last two weeks bashing AT&T’s effort to get into the television programming business.
The cable industry, however, says it is not trying to lobby the general public against the legislation right now, said Stacey Briggs, executive director of the Tennessee Cable Telecommunications Association.
“This could be a matter of timing in getting the commercials off the air,” Briggs said. “There should be no advocacy pieces running right now.”
Briggs said cable providers were notified “a couple of days ago” to stop running ads lobbying against AT&T’s effort to pass a law it says is necessary to compete with cable companies like Comcast.
Rep. Charles Curtiss (D-Sparta), the sponsor of the compromise legislation, said he understands why the cable industry is continuing to run advertisements because they have the most to lose if the compromise bill passes.
“They’re going to squall and squeal because the best thing that can happen to them is we don’t pass this,” Curtiss said.
In Tennessee, unlike other states, cable companies do not face competition from AT&T or other large telecommunications providers.
AT&T wants to pass legislation, which the compromise bill accomplishes, to establish a state-issued franchise process to start providing television programming.
The cable industry, with its business model of going through local municipalities for television franchising rights threatened, has lobbied extensively in the past against AT&T’s move.
Briggs said the industry is currently not lobbying against the legislation and would not acknowledge that cable companies came out the worst in the negotiations.
“It does change the way we’ve been doing business for the past 30 years,” Briggs said.
Meanwhile, the compromise legislation sailed through another committee Tuesday, receiving the unanimous approval of the House Finance Committee. The legislation has one more routine panel to head through before reaching the House floor.
“This bill is about giving consumers choice, putting competition into the marketplace,” said Rep. Steve McDaniel (R-Parkers Crossroads), a bill co-sponsor.
Comcast is a government sanctioned criminal racketeering organization within the telecommunications industry. They are justifiably terrified of the idea they might in the near future have competition for their cable television services because this would mean they would have to pay attention to something they currently ignore, that is customer service. If AT&T makes even a half-assed effort at providing good service at a competitive price Comcast will soon be back at the State Capitol looking for some sort of handout, or they will be out of business in Tennessee within a few years.
NGN, you miss the point entirely. Comcast is begging, pleading not to be thrown into the briar patch, you know that story don't you?They want this new legislation as much as AT&T does because it will free them from certain obligations they have in certain areas of the state, you know which ones they are, don't you?They also want it because they, like AT&T, want those pesky local channels (called PEG channels) out of their hair and off of their wiring so they can make more money faster, you knew that too, didn't you?Or did you only know that "Comcast is a government sanctioned criminal racketeering organization...?"
"20882
The facts in this article are wrong.1: "In Tennessee, unlike other states, cable companies do not face competition from AT&T or other large telecommunications providers."Correction: Anyone can provide cable TV service by following the existing laws in Tennessee. AT&T has chosen not to compete.2. "The cable industry, with its business model of going through local municipalities for television franchising rights threatened, has lobbied extensively in the past against AT&T’s move."Correction: Local franchising is not their business model - it is the law.3. "This bill is about giving consumers choice, putting competition into the marketplace,” said Rep. Steve McDaniel (R-Parkers Crossroads), a bill co-sponsor." Correction: This bill is about rewriting state law to allow different franchising rules.Get it right.
Why does Speaker Naifeh care about the ads? Is it because he'd rather this issue not raise public scrutiny? That would fit his M.O.BTW, kudos to nativenashville for insightfully setting the record straight. There is too many "truths" offered in the local media out of ignorance or laziness.
"are too many"
"20930
I'll miss my local channel. Gone will be the city's government meetings as well as the high school football games and the Christmas parade.
Government meetings are actually quite popular on cable, witness the popularity of C-Span in addition to the PEG channels.One does not have to think long and hard to understand why neither cable nor telco want you to see what the government's doing.Also, those of you in Nashville who enjoy the "Arts" channel on Channel 9 better load up on it, 'cause it's likely to go far, far away when Comcast gets thrown into the briar patch.