Henley executed, maintains innocence in final words

Thursday, February 19, 2009 at 7:53pm

$element(flashss,slideshow,147,Nasc)$

Convicted murderer Steve Henley met his death at the hands of the state with a smile on his face and maintained his innocence even in his final moments amid the cries and prayers of his family.

“As I have said ever since this happened, I didn’t kill them,” Henley said during his final words of his victims, Fred and Edna Stafford. “I hope they can rest easier after this procedure is done.”

Henley was pronounced dead at 1:33 a.m. today in the Riverbend Maximum Security Institute’s death chamber. Henley was put to death using Tennessee’ controversial three-drug protocol for lethal injection, an execution method Henley’s attorneys argued was unconstitutional in last minute briefs to the U.S. Supreme Court as late as yesterday evening just hours before the appointed execution date and time.

Henley was revealed to family members and media witnesses to the execution at 1:17 a.m., already strapped to the death gurney. When he heard the shouts and cries of his family, Henley lifted his head and smiled to them.

In his final words, Henley more than once maintained his innocence in the 1985 murder of the Staffords. Henley also questioned whether his death would bring any peace to the Stafford family, noting his own family’s apparent grief.

“I would like to say I hope this gives Fred and Edna’s family some peace,” Henley said. “In my experience in life, it won’t. The death of a family member never brings anything but pain.”

“I’m an innocent man,” Henley added later.

From the death gurney, Henley also gently admonished his children and sister for their tears.

“Bye,” Henley said, making kissing motions with his mouth to his family. “Stop that crying. Stop it. I’ll see you on the other side. Ya’ll are a pitiful bunch.” The final comment drew laughter not only from his family but also from Henley.

In an emotionally charged death chamber with his distraught son, daughter and sister watching, Henley’s execution began with the command of “proceed” from Warden Rickey Bell at 1:19 a.m.

“I feel it coming on,” Henley said, and then went motionless and made noises as if he were snoring.

The death chamber then exploded in a torrent of emotions from Henley’s family. Henley’s grown son, Greg Henley, wept openly. His daughter, Leanne Henley, screamed, “Oh my God, no, no,” as Henley began to slip away.

At one point, the entire Henley family along with their spiritual advisor Stacey Rector began saying the Lord’s Prayer in unison, their voices growing louder and louder in the death chamber as the familiar prayer advanced.

At about 1:26 a.m., Henley’s face began to turn blue while still strapped to the gurney. His face eventually turned purple as family members watched.

“They killed my brother for nothing!” explained an angry Stephanie Worley, Henley’s sister. Worley eventually turned her anger on members of the press sitting in the death chamber as witnesses.

“I don’t see a tear back here,” Worley said, as she turned to face reporters. “I guess human life has no meaning anymore. Like a bunch of dogs.”

It was unclear from the witness vantage point when during the almost 30 minute process Henley was given the three different drugs – one to act as an anesthetic, another to stop his breathing and a third to stop his heart.

Henley was pronounced dead 14 minutes after the execution began with the command from the warden.

“The state of Tennessee just killed an innocent man,” George Henley said in the death chamber after his father had passed. “I forgive them, but two wrongs don’t make a right. I hope they know that.”

Henley was convicted and executed for the grisly murders in Jackson County of the Staffords in 1985. The couple was shot by Henley in a dispute over money and then placed inside their house, which he then set on fire. Edna Stafford, though shot twice, was still alive and died from injuries suffered in the blaze.

Tennessee Department of Corrections staff said a nephew of the Staffords, Jack Stafford, witnessed the execution from another room.

Henley has maintained his innocence for over two decades, saying it was the man that testified against him who actually committed the murders.

Henley was the fifth person to be executed in Tennessee since 1960 and the fourth by lethal injection. Presently, Tennessee’ lethal injection protocol is the subject of a legal battle in the 6th Circuit Court of Appeals where condemned inmate Edward Harbison is trying to see an opinion from district court upheld that states Tennessee’s lethal injection method constitutes cruel and unusual punishment.

Greg Henley spoke emotionally to members of the media after the execution. He and his sister, Leanne, stood arm-in-arm, appearing to hold back sobs. Greg Henley’s voice broke as he maintained his father’s innocence.

“I forgive the state of Tennessee for executing our loving Daddy. I want them to know I’m praying for both our side of the family, and Fred and Edna Stafford’s family,” Greg Henley said. “But I also want you to know, you executed an innocent man, an innocent man.”

Rector said Henley was “at peace.” As prospects of legally staying the execution grew bleaker as the day progressed, Rector said Henley accepted the developments and was “ready,” though he maintained concerns for his family and for the Staffords’ family.

“I very much believe he ministered to me far more than I ministered to him tonight,” Rector told reporters. “I think what he hopes most is that story will be told now, even if he’s not here, because he very much feels that it should be.”

Last-minute appeals on Henley’s behalf were denied, said Henley’s attorney, Paul Davidson of Waller Lansden Dortch & Davis. A request made to Gov. Phil Bredesen for a 30-day reprieve was also denied. The 30-day reprieve was requested to allow for presentation of a clemency petition.

“Unfortunately, the governor made the decision not to give him that opportunity, and that ended [Hensley’s] appeals tonight,” Davidson said.

Near the prison, more than 60 demonstrators gathered to show their opposition to the death penalty, a turnout that surprised Tennessee Coalition Against State Killings (TCASK) field organizer Isaac Kimes. Temperatures in Nashville hovered around 15 degrees early Wednesday morning, and a light snow fell during parts of the evening. Due to the weather and to the midnight start of the demonstration, Kimes said he was very pleased with the number of people participating.

Volunteers at the event said they wouldn’t be anywhere else. Some held signs, or Bibles. While TCASK is a secular organization, Kimes said the anti-death penalty movement draws a number of volunteers who oppose execution on religious grounds.

“I believe that my faith calls me to be here, and to speak out against something I don’t believe in. I believe that God is love, and God is forgiveness as well,” said demonstrator Menzo Faassen.

“From a religious standpoint, I don’t think that anyone has the right to take another person’s life, in any form or fashion. The fact that the state of Tennessee, of which I’m a citizen, is pre-meditatively taking another person’s life is just incomprehensible to me. I need to be out here to stand against that,” said TCASK volunteer Harry Simpson. “Tennesseans are better than this. … I don’t know why more people aren’t out here.”

For those at the vigil, the presence of Michael McCormick – a Tennessee man who spent 17 years on death row before being acquitted and released in 2007 – served as testimony to a legal system that sometimes makes mistakes.

“I’m here to support Steve. I’m here to support all of [those on death row]. I knew them for 20 years,” McCormick said. “The system can fail. People can be executed for crimes they didn’t commit. People need to keep that in mind.”

Filed under: City News
Tagged:
By: dargent7 on 12/31/69 at 7:00

23 years on "Death Row"? Either DNA evidence proved him culpable or it didn't.We, as a society, have got to get the freekin' lawyers out of the equation. They will all lie like dogs and distort the truth.Look at the Caley Anthony case.And in 2009 there has to be drugs that kill swiftly. A little pain for the soon to be dead is fine with me.

By: idgaf on 12/31/69 at 7:00

Its not so much the lawyers as the politicians. With over a hundred on death row and them only scheduling them once every few years most will die of old age. (5 in 48 years is absurd)Its like they give oponants time to raise money for the court battles.Take the fight to them and schedule one a week or one a month.

By: BigPapa on 12/31/69 at 7:00

Next!

By: EquinsuOcha on 12/31/69 at 7:00

I think he was not guilty.

By: mattiemae on 12/31/69 at 7:00

Death has a terrible sting for the just and the unjust. However, I feel that this man should have been granted something. Look at those who have committed the same crime and been on death row for many many years. And we know that they are guilty beyond a shadow of a doubt. Stop building prison, start capital punishment. Whosoever shall take a life, must pay with his own. That's Word.

By: frank brown on 12/31/69 at 7:00

Henley belonged to a club reserved for men & women of staunch conviction. Never admit anything even if you are caught semi red handed. To admit guilt only feels good for those that have caught you.

By: MJB on 12/31/69 at 7:00

This is one of the best-written stories I have seen in quite a while. My compliments to both Clint Brewer & Amy Graydon.As to its subject: What a shame that Phil Bredesen, who had nothing to gain by killing Steve Henley, decided to do so. Bredesen now has the blood of four harmless men on his hands. As do we: What a shame that we have killed this man, who, if he killed the Staffords, did so while highly intoxicated, and who received inadequate counsel during his trial. What a shame that we annually lower ourselves to the level of killers simply to kill people who can do no more harm—if they ever did.Dargent & Idgaf, if you find the rate of killing too slow, then your complaint is with the constitution. Killing violates the Eighth Amendment, but our courts skirt around that by ensuring many procedures. Feel free to move to Saudi Arabia or the wilds of Afghanistan, where killing proceeds apace, but don’t try to turn our land into a more barbaric place.I am very impressed that sixty people turned out in such bitter cold. Someday, state-killing will be a thing of the past, but we still have a ways to go.

By: slacker on 12/31/69 at 7:00

I think there is probably more evidence proving guilt in this case, that is not included in this story.

By: BigBillInAntioch on 12/31/69 at 7:00

MJB,Your probably also impressed with people who want to stop sanctioned state-killing of unborn baby's. Right? "

By: idgaf on 12/31/69 at 7:00

How about banishment? Would you be in favor of a maximum security facility in Alaska?

By: Dragon on 12/31/69 at 7:00

Article [VIII.] Excessive bail shall not be required, nor excessive fines imposed, nor cruel and unusual punishments inflicted. What punishment is NOT considered cruel? Imprisoned for life, with no hope of ever being free, seems cruel.

By: TRHJR on 12/31/69 at 7:00

mjb why didn`t you invite mr. henley to your house... u two could pal around....and u could have kept him up !

By: skybolt on 12/31/69 at 7:00

Barbaric! Those who administered the injection(s) should be held on counts of first degree, premeditated murder! They did this with full knowledge that they would be killing someone! The whole of the death penalty is simply barbaric! To those who are guilty, it is much more of a hardship and punishment to endure many years in prison than it is to die. To those who are innocent, at least they have their lives if they are in prison and can continue to fight their conviction.

By: slacker on 12/31/69 at 7:00

skybolt, sounds like you have experience.

By: MJB on 12/31/69 at 7:00

Bill, I am very much against the killing of babies and in favor of those who try to stop it. Fortunately, the state does not kill babies.Dragon, killing someone is both cruel AND unusual. Considering how many people think that prisoners have it too easy, you would have a hard time claiming that life imprisonment is unconstitutionally cruel. I tell you what, however: Since you consider life w/out parole as cruel, then you & I can begin by banning killing as even more cruel (and unusual), and we can examine all other proposed punishments for their cruelty.TRH, I was already hosting Mr. Henley at the prison (as were you), and he would have been a less expensive guest if our fellow Tennesseans hadn’t wanted to kill him.

By: BlackWidow on 12/31/69 at 7:00

Our tax dollars pay for the room, board and upkeep of these animals. Those currently on death row were convicted and sentenced by a jury of their peers. For those whom DNA testing proves innocent, release them. For those whose crimes were committed long before the discovery of DNA, sorry Charlie. For those whose DNA is positively linked to their victim(s), tell them about Jesus and flip the switch.

By: koolbass on 12/31/69 at 7:00

"For rulers are not a terror to good conduct, but to bad. For government is God's servant to you for good. But if you do wrong, be afraid, because it does not carry the sword for no reason. For Government is God's servant, an avenger that brings wrath on the one who does wrong."(Romans 13:4)This scripture speaks for itself, to anyone who will listen. It doesn't say government carries a "big switch

By: total_kos on 12/31/69 at 7:00

Two people involved in the SAME crime. One receives a five year sentence, the other is put to death. Help me to understand this.

By: plainolamerican on 12/31/69 at 7:00

“From a religious standpoint, I don’t think that anyone has the right to take another person’s life, in any form or fashion.---so, you don't think that upholding man's law is right? The fact that the state of Tennessee, of which I’m a citizen, is pre-meditatively taking another person’s life is just incomprehensible to me. I need to be out here to stand against that,” said TCASK volunteer Harry Simpson---Harry should move to another state - or better yet, another country where liberals are respected

By: gdiafante on 12/31/69 at 7:00

MJB justifies the Stafford's brutal murder by stating Hensley was "intoxicated" and then blames us for his justice.I hope you were under the influence of some drug when you posted your misguided diatribe.

By: peaceonyou on 12/31/69 at 7:00

Civilization glorifies violence IN ENTERTAINMENT , boast about power and greed, worship God and hate in the same breath ,commit capital punishment as a sanctioned killer, give no mercy and expect mercy,point the finger and never admit fault,don't talk to me about painless executions it's all murder.

By: shenanigan on 12/31/69 at 7:00

We goof I do believe we the state of Tennessee has took the life of a innoncence man. If killing a person is a deterrent to crime then why is it not carried out a noon and school kids was not force to watch. I oppose the death penalty as it is carried out through most states. If mr. Henely is guilty which I do not think he is. it is not right to hold a person 23 years and then kill him or her. I guess you can say I do believe they are some use for the death penalty but it is not right in Mr. Hensley case. I like Clint Eastwood he made in one of his movie. When you take a person life you take away everything he has or everthing he is going to have,and it not right to feed and house a person all these 23 years and then take him to slaughter. now some of you say "God have mercy on his soul."

By: MJB on 12/31/69 at 7:00

I don’t justify anyone killing anyone, Diafante. If you can find a justification of murder or of killing in my remarks, then please show it to me.BlackW, if you respected Jesus, then you would be speaking out against state-killing. Referring to any fellow human being as an animal goes against the teaching of Jesus.Thanks for quoting Harry Simpson, Plain. It’s always to know of others working to make Tennessee a better place.

By: idgaf on 12/31/69 at 7:00

An eye for an eye

By: Gusdog on 12/31/69 at 7:00

idgaf - "An eye for an eye"But Jesus said turn the other cheek.If Henley did commit murder, then it's not a terrible tragedy that he was executed. But we've held people on death row in this state who were exonerated by DNA evidence. We don't know that we've executed an innocent person in Tennessee, but it has happened in other states. The government putting innocent people to death, either due to prosecutorial misconduct or inadequate representation, should give us all pause. Sadly, I think many of us are bloodthirsty enough that we don't mind if an innocent person gets caught in the wheels of justice (see Black Widow's "sorry Charlie" line).If Henley was innocent of the murders which he claimed he did not do, then God have mercy on all of our souls.

By: Houston on 12/31/69 at 7:00

Cultural Relativism! If he thought it was OK to kill other people, then the state should accept his values: it's OK to kill other people (specifically, Steve Henley).

By: elvisisdead on 12/31/69 at 7:00

why do we kill people who kill people to show that killing is wrong? i believe that henley was innocent. if that is true then the killer is still out there. have you ever witnessed an execution? i have a dear friend who has and it is an awful thing to see (this person was guilty of the crime and admitted it). it didn't give the family any peace they were so angry they had no where to direct the anger any more. read the book... "death at midnight and executioners confessions" by donald cabana and see if you still agree with legalized homicide.

By: MJB on 12/31/69 at 7:00

Thanks, Houston. You've made the case against state-killing.

By: koolbass on 12/31/69 at 7:00

Gusdog,"An eye for an eye" was an Old Testament meting out of justice, which became invalid when Jesus died on the Cross.Yes, Jesus did say if a person strikes you, to turn the other cheek so he can strike it, and he goes on to say we should forgive him for doing it "7 times 70 times".But Jesus was teaching about individual behavior and forgiveness, when someone does you wrong. He was not speaking about the duties of the government, because the government's "job" is to use the sword against evil, according to Romans 13:4, and a sword is a weapon of death. (They did have poison back then, but not a 3 drug cocktail as was used to allow this man to fall into a deep sleep and fade into death.)If you're going to use the teachings of the Bible, you need to do so with understanding and context.These concepts of secular humanism seem noble and righteous at face value, but they are not the values our Creator wishes for us to follow in all situations. Individuals have a responsibility to respect others, but the government is not an individual, and has the job of protecting individuals, and meting out justice on those who choose to do evil to other individuals.The Bible clearly takes that difference into account.

By: MJB on 12/31/69 at 7:00

Kool, you point out the contradictions within the Bible, and how we should not consult it for advice about running a government. Thank you.