Jameson's home-based business bill triggers neighborhood debate

Thursday, May 5, 2011 at 9:05pm

Metro Councilman Mike Jameson has proposed a bill that seems reasonable enough — he wants to update the city’s codes to protect those Nashvillians who are currently illegally, and unwittingly, operating home-based businesses.

Essentially, Metro law allows residents to operate businesses from their houses, but it doesn’t allow patrons or visitors to stop by for business purposes. Thus, home-based piano teachers, architects and others who have clients visit should technically be written up.

“The piano teacher who teaches students in her living room, or the accountant who sees clients in his kitchen, or the photographer who has a home studio where people have to come because he needs to take their picture — all of them are illegal and they don’t have a clue that they’re illegal,” Jameson said.

Jameson’s ordinance would change the city’s antiquated home occupation code to allow on-site clients upon the business owner’s receiving a special permit. In doing so, it would align Nashville with Tennessee cities like Memphis, Knoxville and Chattanooga, as well as peer cities like Indianapolis, Charlotte and Louisville, all which have similar policies. 

“I can’t think of anybody who wants these businesses to be prohibited,” Jameson said. “Other cities have it, and it seems to have worked well in those other cities.”

Despite Jameson’s good intentions, the ordinance was met with criticism at a public hearing earlier this week. Just one Nashvillian spoke up in favor of the bill at the Tuesday council meeting, while several lined up against it, with concerns over traffic, parking and the sanctity of neighborhoods topping the criticism.

“I think this encourages more businesses, and our neighborhoods to become mixed-use,” said Nancy Chiltan, who lives on Byron Avenue. “We just don need it. We need to keep the traffic down. That’s why we live in neighborhoods.”

Others who voiced opposition to Jameson’s bill were former council members J.B. Loring and John Summers, both unconvinced by Jameson’s point that the practice already exists.

“If people want to live in a neighborhood of commercial, there’s plenty of places,” said Loring, who called the measure a “drastic” step. “There’s thousands of commercial buildings right now, and we certainly don’t need the businesses moving into the neighborhoods.”

Summers, who frequently inserts himself into council debates, called the ordinance “dumb.”

Jameson’s bill would allow only 25 percent of a house to be used for commercial purposes. In addition, the ordinance prohibits physical alterations that would change a home’s residential character, and outlaws uses such as restaurants, tattoo parlors and auto repair shops. But Summers wonders how all this can be enforced.   

“At the end of the day, it’s all about enforcement,” Summers said, adding that the Metro Codes Department hasn’t seen an increase in personnel in decades. “There’s a couple of hundred thousand people in this county that are going to get a zone-change, and they don’t really know it.”

Jameson said his bill would actually add restrictions to safeguard homes from commercial activity, adding that home businesses, for example, can currently operate as long as they please. His ordinance would cap operations to normal business hours.

“Whatever the concerns are about how home-based businesses detract from the quality [of neighborhoods] I think are belied by the way this is set up and belied by the experience of other cities,” he said.

On Summers’ criticism specifically, Jameson said he pulled data on the number of businesses operating in zoned-residential areas surrounding Summers’ Wyoming Avenue house that didn’t in fact obtain a home occupancy permit. Jameson said there are 40 within a half-mile. Thus, they’re illegal — whether they’ve had clients visit or not.

“The question is, how many of those have been the subject of complaints to the codes department,” Jameson said. “In other words, if John’s right, clearly these illegal operations would be the subject of multiple codes reports because they’re such anathema to neighborhoods. But I can’t find any.”

For now, the bill has been deferred to make a few revisions and is set to go back before the council on the second of three votes at a later time. In the meantime, Jameson has scheduled a community meeting May 24 at the Howard School building. It begins at 6 p.m. 

Jameson points out that 2010 U.S. Census Bureau figures indicate that nearly 13,000 Nashvillians claimed to work at home. But that doesn’t match the 203 home-occupation permits that have been issued in Davidson County.

“We’re clearly not registering with the public,” Jameson said. We’re not capturing the reality of what’s going on.

7 Comments on this post:

By: HokeyPokey on 5/6/11 at 6:16

Whatever happened to the days of "ignorance of the law is no excuse?"

If these guys want to run bidnesses out of our neighborhoods, tax their butts for the privilege!

HP

By: govskeptic on 5/6/11 at 7:09

The opinion of both Loring and Summers were usually dismissed
while they served in the council and should be dismissed now
as well.

By: bruingeek on 5/6/11 at 9:16

Until there is a realistic definition of "Home-based Business" both the current codes and the proposed code changes are an unenforceable farce. For Loring to expect that mom who teaches piano to a few students each week to seek out the abundance of vacant commercial office space to run her 'business' is so ludicrous it defies imagination. Every home that includes a laptop and an internet connection where someone answers client email or regularly sells items on Ebay could be defined as a 'business' by current standards. Heaven-forbid that there is a desk and a file cabinet in the closet lest the Personalty Tax goons come randomly enforcing antiquated code. All that being said, it appears from this article that there is no definitive difference between the piano teaching mom and a one-hour drive-thru laundry service with tons of traffic.

Surprise me, council people. Come up with an enforceable definition for Home-based Business. And be sure to include all of the 'farms' in Belle Meade who claim federal business exemptions while doing so. Just leave the poor, laptop-owning songwriters and piano teachers alone!

By: grit on 5/6/11 at 10:12

And who's against piano teachers; right? Don't be deceived by the face on the battleflag. If you want 12 customers every day coming to potentially every house in your neighborhood, change YOUR neighborhood to Mixed Use, but don't presume that every other neighborhood in Nashville wants it or is suitable for it. And here's a head's up: Planning Commission members want to expand this to include Saturdays and let those customers park on your streets, not just in the driveways of the home businesses. Jameson represents a lot of downtown, not a traditional neighborhood. He's a lame duck at the end of his term who can carry this. Regardless of the outcome, voters will remember next time he tosses his hat into the ring and will be watching how their Council rep votes (election day in August falls soon after the vote).

By: bmazor on 5/6/11 at 11:59

Swell to hear that he segment of the population who've dumped enough employees to turn so many into self-employed, work-at-home "consultants" and freelancers are now offended that the same people, somehow managing to work at home, might occasionally have a client who parks nearby. Horrors!

Want to gate the neighborhoods to keep the self-employed riff-raff out? Why, it's almost as if they were something scary, like teachers or something.

By: McLassie on 5/6/11 at 3:03

I understand that former Councilman Loring has been working diligently to defeat this bill. Wonder why?

By: angileena67 on 7/3/12 at 1:34

Homebase is a city-wide program designed to help families and individuals overcome immediate housing problems that could result in becoming homeless, and to develop a plan for long-term housing stability.Home Based For Women
Program services are crafted to meet the unique needs of each individual or family and to help meet the demands of maintaining a household.