Naifeh shoots down latest gun permit bill

Thursday, April 3, 2008 at 12:34am

House Speaker Jimmy Naifeh pulled out the big guns Wednesday, using the powers of his post to shoot down a bill making the records of handgun carry permit-holders confidential.

After a House panel Wednesday had unexpectedly approved sealing from public inspection permit-holders’ information, Naifeh took action. He effectively appointed a new member of the House — just sworn in Wednesday — to the panel that had just approved the bill.

Once appointed, Naifeh and the new representative, Rep. Karen Camper (D-Memphis), voted to reconsider the panel’s previous approval of the bill, and then Naifeh and Camper gave the opposition enough votes to kill the measure.

As a result of the new member and Naifeh’s vote, the bill was defeated on a 5-4 vote.

For her part, Camper denied that Naifeh directed her how to vote.

“If she’s going to be paid today, she needs to be working,” Naifeh quipped of Camper.

Naifeh is not a member of the panel, but House rules allow the speaker to vote in any committee or subcommittee. Camper was just appointed to the Legislature by the Shelby County Commission to replace Rep. Gary Rowe, who died of cancer earlier this year.

Camper had requested to be on the House Judiciary Committee. The panel that killed the bill, the Criminal Practice Subcommittee, was a subcommittee of Judiciary that she was placed within.

“When she said Judiciary, I knew that criminal practice was meeting and I took her to the chairman and the committee,” Naifeh said.

Naifeh estimated that he appointed Camper to the Judiciary Committee roughly one hour after she was sworn in, but he could not remember exactly.

The whole sequence of events began after two Nashville Democrats on the Criminal Practice Subcommittee, Reps. Rob Briley and Janis Sontany, left the committee hearing to attend to other bills. Both Briley and Sontany are against making handgun carry permit-holders’ records confidential.

Perhaps seizing upon that, the bill was called up out of order while Briley and Sontany were out of the room and subsequently approved.

Then, Naifeh appointed Camper to the Judiciary Committee and, with he, Camper, Briley and Sontany in the room, voted personally to reconsider the previous approval and then kill the bill.

Rep. Henry Fincher (D-Cookeville), who voted for the bill and chaired the committee in Sontany’s absence, said the proposal’s original approval was not railroaded through.

“It was voted on,” Fincher said. “I voted my conscience as it may and reasonable minds can disagree on a reasonable proposal.”

On Naifeh’s action, Fincher said the “speaker is the speaker.”

“He’s got the right to vote on every committee,” Fincher said. “I respect him. We disagree on this issue.”

Naifeh’s opposition to the bill making handgun carry permit-holders’ records confidential came after he went through a training course Saturday to get his own permit. He still has steps to take to receive it.

Frank Gibson, the executive director of the Tennessee Coalition for Open Government, said handgun carry permit-holders’ records should be open because they have been used to show that permits were issued to convicted felons, a violation of state law.

“The only way for anyone to know the permits were being issued to people who the law says should not have them is for the records to be open,” Gibson said.

Advocates of making the records confidential say it protects the permit-holders’ privacy.

Filed under: City News
Tagged:
By: HenryB on 12/31/69 at 6:00

Good for Naifeh!

By: serr8d on 12/31/69 at 6:00

Naifeh...sucks. Again.

By: wolfwalker on 12/31/69 at 6:00

Did I miss something here? The LAW issues the permits after a background check of the person who requests a gun permit. So why does it need the people to see the records to tell the Law if this person has a criminal background? If permits were issued to felons, then maybe the whole system needs to be reorganized by other people. Also, the records show the name, address, social number and other personal info of the gun carrier. Why does all this need to be made public?

By: pernickety on 12/31/69 at 6:00

Naifeh sucks, and always has,learned politics from the best, John Wilder. Doesn't care about what the majority wants only about what he wants. Article said he was applying for a permit, "if" he follows thru and gets a permit you can bet his records will not be public. It is OK for the peons, not the high and mighty

By: frogmild on 12/31/69 at 6:00

Just another example of Naifeh proving once more to be a jackal with way too much power. He should be in jail not the state house.

By: idgaf on 12/31/69 at 6:00

keep voteing democraps and this is what you get.

By: tv8527 on 12/31/69 at 6:00

Shame on the people of district 81 for continuing to vote this piece of s*** back in again & again.Will someone viable please run against this guy.

By: MJB on 12/31/69 at 6:00

The Republicans try something sneaky w/ the rules, and Jimmy Naifeh beats them at their own game: a good show of parliamentarism, and a vote that came out on the better side. If you wanna own a gun—or, in S8’s case, many guns--, then you can let the rest of us know that you have one—or, in S8’s case, many. If you want your privacy, then show your security & don’t accumulate these unnecessary tools of killing & maiming.