A lot of questions have been swirling around as to how the Tennessee Democratic Executive Committee could throw out the Democratic State Senate primary "won" by incumbent Rosalind Kurita. While a number of legal reasons were used, the genesis of this recent action begins in the mountains of the farthest reaches of the state.
For those who have casually watched this drama at home, let’s see if we can explain how all of this took place.
Kurita has not been in the good graces of Tennessee Democrats since Jan. 9, 2007. On that day, she shocked her colleagues by voting to install Republican State Sen. Ron Ramsey as lieutenant governor, ending the 36-year stranglehold on the office held by John Wilder.
The move permanently fractured an already tenuous relationship she had with members of her own caucus, but landed her the job as Speaker Pro Tempore of the State Senate — appointed by Ramsey. It was an uncomfortable position, however, since her Democratic colleagues largely ignored her the rest of the legislative session.
Fast-forward to this election cycle and Democrats hungry for payback found a willing challenger for the Democratic Primary in Clarksville attorney Tim Barnes.
Both Barnes and Kurita campaigned hard and it showed on election day. Barnes won the vote in Montgomery and Houston counties, but Kurita carried Cheatham County and was close enough in the other two counties to win the race by 19 votes. Or so we thought.
At the same time this race was going on, a hotly contested Republican primary in Northeast Tennessee featured first-term Congressman David Davis trying to hold off a challenge from Johnson City Mayor Phil Roe.
On primary election day, Roe bested Davis by 486 votes. In many respects, that is where Kurita's win took a fateful turn.
Immediately after his loss, Davis started making noise that a "well-funded and systematic effort" to have Democrats vote for Roe cost him his job. The 1st Congressional District has been in Republican hands since 1881 and Democrats have no chance of winning the seat in November's General Election.
Davis pointed to a state law that, in his opinion, barred "cross-over" voting — plumping for a member of one political party but retaining allegiance to another political party. That is difficult to prove in Tennessee because voters don't register their party affiliation.
The state law Davis quoted says "a registered voter is entitled to vote in a primary if: "The voter is a bona fide member of and affiliated with the political party in whose primary the voter seeks to vote; or, at the time the voter seeks to vote, the voter declares allegiance to the political party ... and states that the voter intends to affiliate with that party."
With that, Davis began openly considering filing a challenge with the Tennessee Republican Party. That move seemed to spark some interest from a guy just down the road, Lt. Gov. Ron Ramsey.
In The Times-News, a Tri-Cities newspaper, Ramsey called any challenge by Davis a "major mistake," adding that "you declare the way you are voting when you walk into a voting booth, it would be very hard to prove that there was concerted effort to get Democrats to vote in a Republican primary or vice versa. Even if you could prove that, I don't see it's illegal."
Meanwhile, back in Clarksville, the Davis demise was being watched and Ramsey's interjection caught notice. The feeling among Democrats was Ramsey was speaking less to the 486-vote margin in his home district and more to the 19-vote margin being held by his Democratic ally in Kurita.
Democrats, knowing that no Republican had filed to run in the general election against Kurita, smelled opportunity. Barnes quickly filed paperwork challenging the election, saying that the vote was "incurably uncertain" due to voter irregularities.
Over the course of the next few weeks, while most of the top politicos in the state were at their respective conventions, Barnes and his legal team led by Nashville attorney George Barrett found other ammunition to bolster their claims.
They pointed to other events that took place on election day that they say violated election law, including a poll worker telling voters to vote in the Republican primary for Barnes and claims that Kurita solicited votes while citizens were standing in line to cast their ballot.
Filing a brief on behalf of Kurita was none other than the Democrat Republicans love to hate most: former State Sen. Bob Rochelle of Lebanon. Rochelle was a frontline proponent of former Gov. Don Sundquist's income-tax proposal.
Rochelle argued that the position taken by Barnes was flawed and said publicly that the case was about revenge for Kurita's vote for Ramsey.
As we all know now, the Tennessee Democratic Executive Committee voted 33-11 that the election was "incurably uncertain" and threw out the result from election day. They then charged the Montgomery, Houston and Cheatham County Democratic parties with naming their candidate, most likely Barnes.
Kurita has since filed the necessary paperwork to run as an "official write-in candidate," telling Post Politics’ A.C. Kleinheider, "I think it's obvious why this step was necessary. This is America. You don't just let someone steal an election."
Not ever needing to be prompted to send out a press release, the Tennessee Republican Party has predictably sent out a missive decrying the actions of its rivals and charging it with "disenfranchising voters."
As all of this is happening, the guy who started the talk — soon-to-be-former Congressman David Davis — is packing up his boxes in Washington, D.C. Wonder what he thinks? Well, he told the Knoxville News-Sentinel that "both parties ought to have the right to choose their nominee, and the Tennessee Democratic Party in my mind did the right thing by following Tennessee state law."
Davis will likely not be speaking at State Senate Republican fund-raisers anytime soon.
The dems are really getting sleezy.
Getting? No, they've been that way for awhile now. They're just not even trying to hide it anymore.
This is really a fascinating story. I think Kurita could get national attention here and that the Dems are playing with fire. It, the maneuver is just so transparent. Nobody thinks for one second that this would have transpired had Kurita been a good and loyal foot soldier in the Dem Party.
The Democraps are so eager to control every aspect of government now that they are trying every sleezy maneuver they can think of for a win.
So, Barnes will run unopposed and Kurita will campaign as a write-in.I predict that lazy voters will either push the button for Barnes or leave it blank. Write-in ballaots are too bothersome.
What a party - half of you should be in jail the other half in rehab! (Briley, the whole Ford clan, etc) I wish you WOULD change! So much for claiming to be a party that would reach across party lines. LOL Hang the woman that would dare try to replace that disgrace of a lt. governor with someone that could sit through a meeting without picking his nose. What a crock.
When are the Dems going to start counting the dimpled chads?
This is essentially the same article as yesterday with some interesting, but speculative, background info added.I like Rosalind Kurita. Her expertise on health issues has been an asset to the Senate. What she did in retiring Wilder was something the Democrats should have done themselves before the vote. Bubba Ramsey isn't the replacement I wanted to see but the State Senate isn't exactly filled with statespersons to begin with.The long overdue, and long advocated by Kurita, smoking ban and tax increase on cigarettes may have been helped by Kurita's vote against Wilder. The tobacky-company loving R's and backwoods D's had resisted these changes for years.But for Kurita to not expect retaliation is naive. The R who voted for Wilder four years ago got essentially the same treatment from the R's.
It seems highly probable that no Republican candidate appeared precisely because the Republicans knew they had a reliable person in Kurita. Why run against one of your own?On the other hand, the Democrats reaffirmed their innate genius for self inflicted wounds when they overturned the vote of the people for Kurita. They may not like the outcome, I sure don't, but it was what it was and should not be touched. We are a democracy, not an autocracy.
You would think the Democrats would be embarrassed, by not anticipating the repercussions of this, within their own party.This must be part of the change, and HOPE, that Obama will bring. Thanks, dims.
Lets start at the beginning of the ousting. If a politician wants to be independent and party free, that should be declared at election time. Run as an independent.Kurita committed the same party treason as did Sen. Williams.Both votes of the two senators were profound party issues and tested the true loyality of the elected officials.I admire an independent thinker of which I declare myself. Therefore never declaring a party. If a politician wants to be likewise, let them so declare at election time and not use the resources of the party to get elected.
Looks like a case of vengence against a rogue member who failed to obey The Party.
Of course it is. She should have gone independent like Williams and Leiberman.
Wonder if she/they can run her as a republican?Thats the way to go if she wants to win.
caluttc and Time for Truth, you got it. I can't understand why so many don't.