Protestors denounce CCA for detaining people on immigration-related issues

Sunday, May 15, 2011 at 9:05pm

Protesters gathered last Wednesday outside the Nashville headquarters of the Corrections Corporation of America, the country’s largest operator of private prisons, to denounce what is a significant — and controversial — part of the company’s business: the detention of people on immigration-related issues. 

"CCA exists only to profit from keeping people locked up, whether they be immigration detainees, state, federal or local prisoners,” said Alex Friedmann, a former CCA prisoner and president of the Private Corrections Institute, a group that opposes privately run prisons. “Our position is that it is morally bankrupt and it is ethically corrupt to incarcerate people for the purpose of making money, of keeping them in prison and separating them from their families.” 

The occasion was the billion-dollar company’s annual shareholders meeting. The 50 or so protesters marched outside as Friedmann, a CCA shareholder, attended the meeting, assuring the crowd before entering that he would voice their concerns. 

The Nashville-based company has become a national symbol for what many consider the troubling expansion of privately operated prisons, which stand to profit from more stringent criminal laws, as well as more active law enforcement and aggressive prosecution. 

According to an October 2010 investigation by National Public Radio, CCA is part of a group called the American Legislative Exchange Council, a secretive organization composed of elected officials and major corporations angling to influence them. NPR reported that the group drafted Arizona’s infamously harsh SB 1070, which could criminalize an entire population of immigrants and bring millions into CCA’s coffers. Company executives were eager at the prospects of detaining more immigrants, which they considered an up-and-coming market, according to documents uncovered during that investigation.  

“We’re identifying how the Corrections Corporation of America is profiting off of immigrant populations,” said Katie Vasquez of the Tennessee Immigrant and Refugee Rights Coalition. “By targeting CCA, we’re targeting issues like the criminalization of people of color, the detention of immigrant communities for minor infractions.” 

5 Comments on this post:

By: treehugger7 on 5/16/11 at 7:20

Finally someone is adrressing this issue. As usual, a huge corporation is profiting from poorer peoples' difficulty. CCA ia an entity that shouldn't even exist. For-profit prisons are not well regulated, human rights are regularly ignored, and lots of people die there. This industry should not even exist. Outsourcing something like this is ridiculous. Of course the headquarters is in tennessee....no one other than Arizona would allow this. Yes, I know there are a lot of them around the country now--that doesn't make it right.

By: localboy on 5/16/11 at 8:57

“Our position is that it is morally bankrupt and it is ethically corrupt to incarcerate people for the purpose of making money, of keeping them in prison and separating them from their families.”
How does this differ from a government-run facility?

By: mg357 on 5/16/11 at 11:38

There is no difference in the concept of private prisons versus government owned. CCA holds contracts from the federal government for the detention of illegals who have broken our laws or are awaiting deportation. At one point in time wasn't the idea of privatizing all prisons on the table since the private could operate at a lesser cost than state run prisons. As for separating them from their families; they should have considered this before they broke the law. Ever notice how a former prisoner is the most outspoken advocate against incarceration. Does anyone believe these prisoners could be trusted to leave this country in view of the ones who repeatedly are deported and re-enter on a regular basis. As far as the SB1070 law in Arizona; it should be enforced in more states than Arizona....mg

By: frodo on 5/16/11 at 12:08

Those who will not—seemingly cannot—own up to the flagrant disregard of our national sovereignty and security and cooperate legislatively (laws) and operationally (real enforcement) are the ones to blame for the current pain of immigrants. If we could see any serious ownership of the problem, then many of us who are (wrongly) called immigrant-haters would be willing to find a way to accommodate those who have already entered illegally and made a life here. Trying to point fingers at a government contractor (CCA) is silly and disingenuous. Liberals who will not clamp down on our borders are more to blame than any domestic culprit. It is time to deal more humanely with both illegals AND we the over-taxed, over-spent, terrorist threatened and frankly bankrupt American citizens. Or is citizenship now just a quaint relic of the past? If so, then I'd be happy if some whiners just go ahead and renounce citizenship so it is clear where you stand.

By: mg357 on 5/16/11 at 3:05

Good post Frodo, the line between legal/illegals has become so vague , it's almost non- existant. If one chooses to migrate to another country; the laws of that country should be enforced in order to maintain a participating population who can all benefit without obliterating/overtaxing the existing residents.......what can our lawmakers be thinking..........mg