New York-based Fitch Ratings last week downgraded $210 million in outstanding Metro Water and Sewer revenue bonds from AA to AA-, with the agency citing “a rapid escalation in planned capital spending” following a recent regulatory consent decree requiring the city to upgrade some facilities.
The agency still characterizes the AA- rating as stable.
Metro Finance Director Richard Riebeling downplayed the seriousness of the downgrade. He said the AA- rating doesn’t have any effect on the ability of Metro to borrow and that it’s “not a major issue.”
“It’s a solid rating,” Reibeling said. “We have a strong rating on the water and sewer department. I think they’re concerned about the amount of debt that we may have issued down the road to come to the consent decree with the [U.S. Environmental Protection Agency] and things of that nature, which are all legitimate questions.
“Fitch is taking a very conservative approach to municipal governments, in general,” he said. “It’s much more aggressive in terms of looking at downgrading ... It’s not uncommon.”
In 2009, the Metro Council approved a water and sewer rate hike to build revenue to update Davidson County’s outdated water infrastructure, which is necessary in keeping with federal environmental mandates. The three-year adjustment started in the summer of 2009 with a 7.8 percent increase. The changes also brought in a first-ever $3 stormwater fee.
The rate increase has resulted in an average $3.76 increase on the bills of Metro ratepayers. Before 2009, the city’s last rate increase was in 1996.
A consulting firm in 2006 recommended implementing a water and sewer rate hike that was more than twice the 7.8 percent hike during the first year of the three-year adjustment.
Metro officials are eying $500 million in capital projects for Nashville’s water and sewer system over the next five years, including more than $10 million in stormwater capital project.
Metro fail
Highest water rates in the state, even with a source like
the river flowing through, and have been for many-many
yrs.
The Convention Center is a burden the city should never have attempted.
Exactly Rich, the think the media does not understand is that the debt rating of a government and all its affiliated entities is effected by the indebtedness of all government agencies in that county. The scoring takes into account the citizens/customers ability to pay all government indebtedness. The convention center has raised the cost for all actual government needs.
Water rates are high, my electric bill has increased by at leat 30% above last year, for the appx. same usage & we have a mayor that doesn't know what "needs" are. To add, TVA bigwigs haven't missed a bonus!