School board candidates debate finer points at forum

Thursday, May 22, 2008 at 1:13am
Metro Board of Education candidates participate in a forum Wednesday sponsored by Nashville Neighborhood Defense Fund. Matthew Williams/The City Paper

With an exception or two, school board hopefuls didn’t disagree much Wednesday during a candidate forum on the top issues related to public education in Nashville.

Candidates discussed topics ranging from the special education and the role of magnet schools, to whether sex education and religious education should be part of the curriculum. They weighed in on the director search and how best to work with the mayor’s office and Tennessee Department of Education.

Differences were, for the most part, confined to the finer points of school governance — but many voters may find those fine points define the decisions.

The candidates were part of a panel hosted by the Nashville Neighborhood Defense Fund at Traveller's Rest, which will in the next week or so endorse candidates based on their ability to foster schools that enhance neighborhoods. John Summers, a board member of the Defense Fund and moderator of the panel, told the small crowd of about 20 spectators that his organization has a tough decision to make.

The Defense Fund hasn’t held school board candidate forums in the past, Summers said, but decided to do so this year in light of the big issues facing Metro Nashville Public Schools.

Of the nine candidates participating in the majority of the event, one — Gracie Porter, of District 5 — is running unopposed. Four of the candidates are competing for Bellevue’s District 9 seat. Marsha Warden, who holds the seat currently, is not seeking re-election.

One of the first tasks that Nashville’s next Board of Education will take on will be what many agree is the most significant job of any school board member — hiring a director of schools. School board elections are slated for August, and plans are in place to hire a director of schools in early fall. The current board has decided, with the help of a consultant, to allow the next board to hire the new director, as the next board will be working with the selected individual.

When asked what they would look for in a director, candidates highlighted a number of traits including leadership skills, communication abilities, and an enthusiasm for engaging in Nashville’s diverse schools and communities.

An issue that has been discussed in community forums related to the director search has been a desire to see a new director in place who can rebuild connections between school leaders, teachers and parents. Board candidates on Wednesday discussed how they would work to get competent administrators in schools.

Tim Coleman, who is running against incumbent Mark North for Madison’s District 3 seat, said he didn’t want to come in as a new candidate and criticize former Director of Schools Pedro Garcia — but that he believes school administration starts at the top.

“You have to have the right mentality from a management level to recruit,” Coleman said.

North was unable to attend Wednesday’s forum, as his presence was required at a high school graduation in his district.

District 1 candidate Sharon Gentry said business practices come into play in hiring strong leaders throughout the district.

“Compensation’s a big part of it,” she added.

Gentry is running against Barry Barlow and William Mason Jr. for the seat currently held by longtime board member George Thompson, who is not seeking re-election. Gentry is the wife of former Nashville mayoral candidate and current Nashville Area Chamber of Commerce leader Howard Gentry, who was present at Wednesday’s event.

Special education reached the table when the panel moderator said a question had been submitted by the public about the best approach for handling special education students and whether those kids should be “mainstreamed.” Panel organizers expressed doubt that the question should be raised, as the law addresses these issues clearly, a position that both incumbents on the board — Porter as well as District 7’s Ed Kindall — indicated was correct.

But District 9 candidate Alan Coverstone and others said they believe there can be differences in how the law is enforced, and the question was debated.

Two other District 9 candidates — Paul Brenner and Stephen Hicks — said specifically that they have seen special education laws enforced inconsistently in Metro schools. Brenner, a former teacher, said teachers and principals need to better understand special education laws.

Coverstone, Hicks and Lee Limbird all said they have heard from special education parents with concerns about the system. Coverstone said there is “a large and vocal component of the community” saying that these needs are not being met, and that it is not sufficient to simply say to follow the law and leave it at that.

Limbird said she admires the “intensity” of the advocacy of parents of children with special needs — and that the fact that those parents need to be such strong advocates is evidence that their needs are not being met.

In their responses, both Porter and Kindall agreed that the issue is more complex than just following the law. Porter said there is a need for more training of teachers and principals, and Kindall said too many minority kids are placed in special education classes without adequate cause.

Filed under: City News
Tagged:
By: artsmart on 12/31/69 at 6:00

Leave it to Kindell and Porter to not answer the Special Ed question. Metro Schools has been routinely violating the Federal Laws as it pertains to these kids. They are a large part of the problem because they are the enforcement arm. Kindell whinning that minorities make up to large a part of Special Ed. My question is where are the parents, they cannot put a child in Special Ed without buy in from the parents.

By: breathofdeath on 12/31/69 at 6:00

There is one issue that I've heard nobody in officialdom address: what to do about the lazy students in the school system. I've heard all kinds of talk about tougher teacher standards and holding teachers accountable and I think that is a good thing, but where is the drive to hold students accountable? my wife recently completed her student teaching assignments, one with a class of all 12th graders and the other composed of all freshmen, and the theme was consistent: some good students and others who did the work and worked hard and a bunch of students too lazy to do what was asked of them (some were seen turning in blank test papers and others wouldn't even write their names on tests and homework assignments). It is the students' responsibility to complete assignments and study for tests. Here's a news flash for all those parents who think their little darlings can do no wrong and want to blame the teachers: the best, brightest, and most motivated and best prepared teachers can do a damn thing for students who don't want to be in school, much less do what is expected of them. on top of this issue, there is pressure on teachers to "curve" the grades of these slackers so they will pass, especially in the case of seniors to keep graduation rates from dropping. In effect these kids are being rewarded for not living up to their responsibilities. No reforms proposed will do a bit of good until such time as the students are held equally accountable as the teachers where performance is concerned.

By: ptotaximom7 on 12/31/69 at 6:00

Please note - there are five candidates running for school board in district nine. They are Jim Lech, Stephen Hicks, Paul Brenner, Alan Coverstone and Lee Limbird.