Tennessee Republicans show differences on Iraq strategy

Monday, July 16, 2007 at 12:04am

Although he’s the titular head of the state Republican Party, U.S. Sen. Lamar Alexander’s call for a new strategy in Iraq clashes with some party leaders within his own state’s GOP.

Alexander is co-sponsoring an amendment along with 12 other Republican and Democratic senators to a Department of Defense authorization bill to make the Iraq Study Group’s recommendations law.

His strategy is at odds with President Bush, as well as U.S. Sen. Bob Corker and U.S. Rep. Marsha Blackburn (R-Brentwood), who have encouraged Congress to wait to hear Lt. Gen. David Petraeus’ status report on Iraq in September.

Alexander is eager to hear Petraeus’ report, but he says he also wants action now.

As part of the 79 recommendations contained within the so-called Baker-Hamilton Commission’s report, U.S. troops in Iraq would be moved from a combat role to a training, equipping and advising role within a year of implementation. It would drastically cut the troops in Iraq by as much as half to less than 100,000.

“I thought the president should have adopted Baker-Hamilton in January, I said he should’ve done it in March and I think he should do it today,” Alexander said last week. “And any of those three days will better than doing it in September.”

The viewpoint of Tennessee’s senior senator collides with the wait-until-September beliefs of Republicans like Corker and Blackburn as well as U.S. Rep. David Davis (R-Johnson City).

Corker says that while he has “serious concerns” about the situation in Iraq, the U.S. would be in a “better position” to assess whether Bush’s troop surge has worked in September.

Blackburn said the U.S. hasn’t given the surge and Petraeus’ Iraqi plan a chance to work. The last troops for the surge just recently arrived in Iraq, she says.

“Maybe that is a Plan B to move to that template,” Blackburn said of the Iraq Study Group recommendations. “But I think let’s give our troops the opportunity to do their job.”

Alexander says the problem with the surge is it’s not a new strategy and compared waiting until September to “driving the wagon right up to the cliff and then deciding what to do.” The surge makes more sense, Alexander says, if there is a plan for post-surge Iraq.

Alexander’s amendment does have support from one prominent Tennessee Republican, U.S. Rep. Zach Wamp (R-Chattanooga). Wamp is a co-sponsor of similar legislation in the House that would make the Baker-Hamilton Commission recommendations law.

Wamp said the Iraq Study Group provides a “bipartisan road map” that could bring the country together to try and find a successful solution in Iraq that has soft deadlines on troop withdrawals.

“The Iraq Study Group is the only thing that really has that kind of bipartisan credibility that we can start to follow,” Wamp said. “So I think it’s a very reasonable approach. And I don’t think in anyway it undermines the president or Gen. Petraeus.”

Alexander’s call for a new Iraq strategy has brought the senator national media attention as he’s joined a growing list of Republican senators defecting from Bush and calling for a new course in Iraq.

It has also brought him criticism from some Republicans who think he’s not shooting for victory in Iraq.

Steve Gill, a conservative talk show host on 1510 WLAC, has interviewed Alexander about his new Iraq strategy and says his “biggest concern” is that Alexander is not talking about winning and victory in Iraq.

“I don’t hear words like victory, success and win in his new strategic move,” Gill said. “And he didn’t ever use the words victory, win, success. It was how do we extricate our troops from the combat business with honor.”

A vote on Alexander’s Iraq Study Group amendment could happen this week. Co-sponsored along with 12 other senators perceived to be moderates, the amendment is being opposed by both sides of the political spectrum.

Democrats wanting to end the war in Iraq, like Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.), have called it “toothless” and criticized it for not having a timetable for withdrawal. Meanwhile, many Republicans want to wait on Petraeus in September.

One top Tennessee Republican, U.S. Rep. Jimmy Duncan (R-Knoxville), has been against the Iraq war since its inception.

Filed under: City News
Tagged:
By: dooley on 12/31/69 at 6:00

Corker,Blackburn and Davis are not rerpresentatives of the people but rather are simply lapdogs for an idiot in chief.

By: idgaf on 12/31/69 at 6:00

Time to put Alexander out to pasture. Thank Goodness we can do that in the next election and don't have to wait.

By: theplantsman on 12/31/69 at 6:00

Why wait until the next election cycle? I say re-call them now. Based on performance, that Sea Hag Speaker of the House and her Liberals has done nothing (typical of liberals) but squawk. Therefore, as the proverbial saying goes “Either lead, follow or get out of the way”, I strongly suggest that liberals such as Reid, Alexander and the Sea Hag get the hell out of the way.

By: dgamble on 12/31/69 at 6:00

Steve Gill is confirmation that the Bush administration is really a reincarnation of the Nixon Administration. With Cheney and Fred Fielding - and all the media lapdogs talking about "victory in Iraq - I can just hear the daily misinformation about vietnam like it was yesterday. Gill, and the so-called Christian leaders (Dobson, Falwell) remind me so much of Billy Graham and other media figures that travelled to the Nixon White House in an attempt to lend legitimacy to that failed, fascist administration. George W. Bush - the new Richard M. Nixon...

By: idgaf on 12/31/69 at 6:00

Funny that they use the term lap dog all the time when it is they that march in lockstep.Disagree or present a different opinion and they shun you like they did to Liberman who a few short years ago they ran as VP in an attempt to lure moderates.Best political advice I have ever been given is watch/listen to what they are accuseing others of doing and you will know what they are up to.Heil Nancey, Heil Reid, Kennady et al.

By: 37205Democrat on 12/31/69 at 6:00

Have Corker and Blackburn said what they plan to do or say if Gen. P. says things aren't going so well? My guess is they'll blame him and nobody else.

By: Time for Truth on 12/31/69 at 6:00

Alexander is putting himself in a good position for re-election by distancing himself from a President with no credibility and a thirty percent approval rating. Corker was probably told to toe the line. After splitting with Bush on the immigration bill, the national party lkely reminded him that they came in to get him elected with their dirty-tactics swift boat squad. As for Marsha, she's just an idiot.

By: idgaf on 12/31/69 at 6:00

Alexander has been a RINO his whole term.You want to hear his statement to Reid on Meet the Depressed telling him how he can get the 60 votes.If I was a democrap I would like him too. Next best thing when you can't win an election is to have a RINO win.

By: theplantsman on 12/31/69 at 6:00

37205Democrat realistically, what spin do Reid and the Sea Hag Pelosi plan (I never expect a liberal to actually DO something) when our military defeats the insurgents and restores order to Iraq vis-à-vis kicking the crap out of the Mullah’s and enabling he Iranian citizens to take control of their own government?

By: Time for Truth on 12/31/69 at 6:00

ah, plant, you need to move to China. They are in name communists, but they pollute with impunity, treat their poor like crap and allow their wealthy to do whatever they want to. And they do a fair amount of sabre rattling too. This sounds like your idea of a perfect society. And you need to change medications as evidenced by your visions of our future in Iraq.