An Election Commission Official said today that protocol for storing laptops containing voter information was not followed prior to a break-in around Christmas that resulted in the laptops containing the Social Security numbers of more than 300,000 Davidson County voters being stolen.
Election Administrator Ray Barrett said the laptops were supposed to be under lock and key in a cabinet, but were left out after undergoing some maintenance and testing by the Metro IT department.
Barrett said they were trying to get one laptop ready for early voting that begins Jan. 16 and testing out a program that would file the last four digits of a citizens Social Security number as opposed to the entire number.
“This computer had been pulled out of the lock room and set out on the desk to run this test,” Barrett said. “What happened, they didn’t put it back up. So yes, they’re locked up.”
State Election Coordinator Brook Thompson said his office will be talking with county election commissions across the state to remind them to take extra precautions to protect voters’ identifications.
Thompson said the theft raises the issue of security at election commissions statewide.
“The county election commissions obviously need to be aware of where they have the data stored and how it’s being secured and take necessary precautions to protect that,” Thompson said.
Metro Police said the act was a simple break-in and they have no evidence to prove the thief or thieves were after the information located on the laptops — complete Social Security numbers and addresses for more than 300,000 voters.
This is an example of incompetence ... not governmental incompetence ... just incompetence in general. To not make provisions to totally secure sensitive information ... to place thousands in harms way ... is beyond comprehension. This is carelessness at its greatest height. While I am not one to call for "heads should rolled" there should be consequences from such outlandish malfeasance and immediate assurance that personal data will be protected where ever it is housed. I am very upset about my own data, as well as the personal information of others being in the wrong hands.Avi Poster
We need the resignation of all top administrators involved.
Why should the administrator be fired? It sounds like poliices are in place, but they were not followed. The incompetents who left the computers unlocked should be fired.
The headline seems to be an understatement! Whether by the IT employees or the normal operators of these computers, there is no reason for the proper procedures to not be followed. The reason the administrator should be fired is because he is ultimately responsible for all the employees and that they follow the security procedures that are in place. That is why he is an executive and why he gets paid more. The buck starts and stops with him. He needs to go, and the people under him need to go, because they all are incompetent, him in management and them in the execution of their duty.