Like in any political environment, Nashville’s chatter class gets obsessed with certain topics. Two of those topics of late that have hung on longer than most are the “English Only” debate and the state of the city’s public schools.
A conservative corner of the Metro Council wants to make English the official language of Nashville government — a sentiment no doubt tied to the ongoing backlash against the growing Hispanic population in the city. The city’s liberals and moderates are aghast at the impact it might have on the city’s public image.
Nashville’s schools have also been the source of much teeth gnashing for the last few years, as the system has sunk into a form of state receivership under federal No Child Left Behind laws. Local school system managers are no longer running the schools. Instead, state bureaucrats are in charge.
Ironically, in one of the fastest growing, most diverse and immigrant-rich areas of the city, non-English speaking immigrants want to learn English. Yet, they have no place to take advantage of Metro government funded classes to learn English. Perhaps on an even sadder note, in the same rapidly growing portion of the city, educational resources are available for students cannot be used because of a simple lack of space.
Maybe it is because Antioch just isn’t that trendy. Let’s be honest. Antioch is not a very cool place to live or even admit you have visited if you move in the power circles of Metro government. Despite massive growth and its potential strategic positioning as a future site for economic development, Antioch has gotten little to no attention from Metro government when it comes to simple infrastructure needs.
That approach leaves Metro resources on the table. For example, funding could be secured for two pre-kindergarten classrooms in the Antioch area, if there were a public community center in which to house the classrooms.
Translators and English classes are services the school system provides throughout Davidson County, including in the Antioch area. But for most effective delivery of those services, a space other than a school should be used.
In other parts of the community — for example, East Nashville and the Park Avenue areas — the school system uses Metro community centers as neutral, family-friendly spaces to reach out to parents. Parents, including those who have had trouble in school, had negative encounters with the law, or who may be undocumented immigrants may be less likely to take advantage of services offered in schools and other government buildings.
And here is a little fact for Councilman Eric Crafton. A service already offered in the Antioch area — a regular “family night” event at Apollo Middle School, in which children help their non-English-speaking parents improve their English skills — will benefit from not being held in a school building.
It is no secret in Metro government that Antioch needs more public infrastructure. The Metro Parks Department has already identified Antioch as an area vastly underserved by city government.
There is also a rising tide of crime in the Antioch area that is undeniable. In City Paper editorial board interviews with candidates from the Antioch area more than two years ago, they all expressed concerns about making Antioch streets safer and free of proliferating street gangs. The bad public image of Hickory Hollow Mall says it all about the problems facing the area.
At the same time, Antioch is one of the places in Metro where truly affordable housing for young, working families exists, and one of the few places left with ready interstate access and wide open green spaces for economic development. There is also a truly diverse, multi-racial and ethnic community in the area that brings richness to the city few other areas can offer.
It may not agree with the strident new urbanism crowd that dominates the dialogue in Metro government and wrings their hands about sprawl, but Antioch has a great deal to offer Nashville.
It is past time for Metro government to meet that community halfway.
If they ran a sting operation in Antioch to rid the area of illegals and put forth an effort to enforce codes on how many can live in a single family dwelling, cleaning up trash & parking cars in yards, Antioch would greatly improve.
Who plans on paying for all these classes to teach these illegals. Right, the taxpayers of Nashville. That is the main reason residents want them gone. Also this is another reason businesses are leaving Hickory Hollow Mall, too much gang activity and people don't want to shop in little Mexico.
Amen to this message also, 2476! That is exactly what put Harding Mall out of business! The Mexicans & thugs took it over. That is what has & is causing American citizens to sell or close their businesses in the take over areas.
This person is saying the immigrants can't learn English because.....these "services" are provided in schools, not community centers? And you can't learn English unless the government pays for it.And pre-K should be taught in community centers because the schools can not accomodate more classrooms? That's called daycare. Funding "could" be secured (but it's not in the budget).And finally, there is truely affordable housing available because no one wants to live in a high crime neighborhood. It doesn't matter that the gangs are diverse, multi-racial, and ethnic.
Dragon, it's getting to be just as bad in the area across from McKendree Village now. There are duplexes over there, and at any given moment, 40+ people standing outside and around many of those homes, sorto of like a commune. My friends tell me that the inhabitants are living better here than where they came from, but the neighbors who've lived in nearby houses are absolutely ticked. Their quality of life has dropped drastically, along with their safety/comfort level.
go after the people who rent to these 'undesirables'
I have 2 rental houses in Antioch and I assure anyone, there have never been any illegals living in either. Further, there never will be!
Funditto is right. Go after the owners of the property.
The letter says that "truly affordable housing for young, working families" is a plus. Why hassle owner of the property? Should they only rent to more affluent (higher priced) tenants?
This sentence, "Parents, including those who have had trouble in school, had negative encounters with the law, or who may be undocumented immigrants may be less likely to take advantage of services offered in schools and other government buildings" makes no sense to me at all. If people are already breaking the law by being in the country ILLEGALLY, then of course they want to stay under the radar. Therfore, they would not attend functions in "government" buildings. Dragon, the owner of any property has the final responsibility of what goes on in and at the property, that's why! A renter signs an agreement with the owner of the property, but that agreement does not negate the owner's responsibility to follow codes and the local laws. And my job sends me into many homes all over the areas in a 60-mile radius around Nashville. I am amazed and quite frankly alarmed that we are allowing people to put up little storage sheds in their back yards and convert them into bedrooms. It is against codes. I understand that certain cultures have "family beds" and multiple components of the family living with them. That is fine. But when you move into an area that has laws and codes about building occupancy, then you have to respect the area you are moving into. If the people who want to pack 14 people into a 4 bedroom home want that to be the "norm" then let them go through proper channels and have the codes and laws changed to their benefit. Maybe a lobbyist can help them. But for the time being, they need to obey laws and codes. I think that is what most law-abiding tax paying citizens are angry about. And bfra, I had "legals" living in my rentals and got burned to the tune of $10,000, and I'm with you. I would never rent to anyone who could not prove they are U.S. citizens.
sidney - Eviction laws are on the side of the renter. If you win in court, they still have 10 days to move, which usually means a lot of abuse to your property (spite) and you still probably never collect back rent or damages.
bfra, well my renter's "thought" they had the law on their side, but I won. I have a good attorney who got the judgement and now I'm collecting the moola. Not as fast as I want to, but like my attorney said "it's like a little savings account" and the law gives me 10 years to collect. Yes, they did damage, but they are paying for it. And the back rent is included in the judgement. I had excellent records and a good lawyer who only gets paid "when" he collects. Be positive! Evil loses in the long run and good prevails!
I have only had that problem once to any extent, and the guy is in the pen on other charges, committed shortly after he finally got out. He had a clean record and good references when I rented to him.Glad your case is working out in your favor.