Opinion: McCain needs to get his campaign back on track

Wednesday, October 1, 2008 at 12:14am

John McCain isn't dead in the water. But he sure is dying. He lost the debate and the polls are dismal. Gallup has him down 50-42 percent. Rasmussen has Obama ahead 50-44 percent.

And both polls are only partially after the debate. Obama won the debate. When the polls come in fully, the picture won't get any prettier for those of us who favor McCain.

His gambit of suspending his campaign and going to Washington has failed because he did not think it through adequately or correlate it with what was happening in Congress. The Republicans teed up a perfect shot for him. He took the bat but went back to the dugout without even swinging.

McCain should have gone into the debate challenging Obama on his $700 billion taxpayer bailout of financial institutions. He should have pushed the Republican alternative. He could have said, plain and simple, that Obama wants to make Americans pay for $700 billion in bad mortgages and McCain wants to make businesses pay for their own bailout through loans and insurance premiums.

It would have been a straight shot. But McCain copped out and mumbled something about the deal being the "end of the beginning" and said he hoped to vote for the bailout. It was a failure that may have cost him his best shot at the presidency.

But it was not his only shot. McCain can still win.

He needs to deploy the tax issue. His campaign has to stop the scattershot Web ads and focus instead on a sustained attack on Obama's plans for tax increases. Stop the pinpricks and go for the jugular. It is only through the tax issue that McCain can win this campaign.

Voters understand that our economy is vulnerable and teetering on the brink of a black hole. McCain needs to capitalize on this new sense of vulnerability and hammer away at the Obama tax proposals. He needs to say that our system is starving for capital. Raising capital gains taxes, much less doubling it as Obama proposed during the primaries (but now is trying to backtrack), is like taxing water in the desert. McCain has to talk about Obama's spending proposals and mock the idea that he can spend a trillion and still give "95% of Americans" a tax increase.

McCain should take a page out of the playbook of the endgame of the Bush 1992 campaign. With Bill Clinton holding a solid lead, Bush was reluctant to attack him for his record of tax increases, especially given his violation of his 1988 "read my lips" pledge not to raise taxes. So the campaign sent Vice President Dan Quayle out to attack Clinton, day after day, for raising taxes. And the results were clear in the polls. Bush gained each day and, four days before Election Day, Bush took a lead over Clinton in the tracking polls.

Clinton was saved by the announcement by Iran Contra Special Prosecutor Lawrence Walsh that he was planning to indict Cap Weinberger, Bush's Defense Secretary. Clinton surged ahead and won the election. But the tax issue had almost reversed his lead in the polls.

If McCain pounds away at taxes, taxes, taxes he can still win this election. By tying the Obama tax plans to the possibility of massive depression, he can pull this out.

Remember: Whenever we raised taxes amidst a downturn, we triggered a massive falloff. It was the tax increases of the early 1930s that worsened the Great Depression and it was Bush's 1990 tax increase that created the 1991 recession that cost him his job.

America understands that we can't raise taxes now. American grasps that Obama will not just raise taxes on a handful of rich people but will raise them on everybody. And we understand that Obama has no real answer to this charge. McCain just needs to begin to make this central attack his campaign theme from now on.

Filed under: City Voices
Tagged:
By: NonyaBidness on 12/31/69 at 7:00

In other words, per Mr. Morris, McCain should continue to lie about Obama's tax plan, just much louder and more often.

By: idgaf on 12/31/69 at 7:00

obama is the one lieing about his tax plan. He will say and do anything to get elected.McCain is no bargan but he does have the tax issue right and has best ondeck batter with results.To put the #1 and # 3 liberals in their with control of both houses we are dead meat.

By: BigPapa on 12/31/69 at 7:00

This has been Bob Dole all over again. Do you think the old solider realizes he was tossed out there as cannon fodder/shark chum?

By: revo-lou on 12/31/69 at 7:00

That is what I have been saying for a while BigPapa, that McCain was a sacrifice because the Republicans thought that Hillary was gonna get the nod, and when she didn’t, it was too late to reel McCain back in.

By: frank brown on 12/31/69 at 7:00

McCain has fought the good fight but George W. Bush was too much of a load to overcome.

By: Idahoser on 12/31/69 at 7:00

Why is Dick Morris not selling pencils on the corner? Remember "Hillary can't be beat"?As for McClown, our next pres will be the worst ever. It doesn't matter which one of them it is.That this election is considered so close is simply a demonstration of how absolutely awful they both are. If there was anybody with half an ounce of guts to stand up to these socialists, there would be no need to hold an election, we'd have already crowned him.McClown is working hard to make me stay home, when I'd like to vote for his veep if he'd just shut up.In the end I frankly don't care who wins this election. The less difference there is between them, the more "important" Gwen Ifill tells you the election is. Hell with that. They are the same.

By: courier37027 on 12/31/69 at 7:00

Bob Barr or Ron Paul should run as independent. Promise a lower income tax rate, no bailout for mortgage and Wall Street messes. Independent candidate should propose an economic stimulus package disguised as your own social security money refunded to you in one big check, then dismantle the agency. Expect a landslide win. Oh, to dream... .The two candidates we have now are awful and worse. Maybe, just maybe, there will be some kind of popular revolution within four years.

By: Time for Truth on 12/31/69 at 7:00

id, in the last election, you called Kerry and Edwards the #1 and #4 liberals. Do you publish your rankings? Or just get them from Rush Pillbaugh?courier, I thought Barr was already running as a Libertarian or something. Did he get out?Idahoser, the bar has been set so low for the past 8 years, both candidates would have to dig a tunnel to sink any lower.I don't think I could take four years of that whiney "Fargo" voice telling us that big oil is an ally of God and they should get whatever they want.Clinton turned lemons into lemonade with a Republican majority. Bush just got into a contest with the Democratic majority to see who could do less. Good riddance! The next President whoever it is has a lot of fixing to do and hopefully, whoever wins, they are capable of working with the Congress.

By: Time for Truth on 12/31/69 at 7:00

Dick Morris is still useless. On that issue I agree with Idahoser.McCain won't go to the right of Bush. He'll let Palin do that for the wingnut faithful, but when deregulation and 'trickled on' economics has so spectacularly failed, McCain would do best to say little or nothing on the economy and harp on the Commander in Chief issue. Obama 'won' the debate because he stayed even with McCain on the topic where McCain is supposed to be the expert. In the beginning of the debate that covered economics, McCain was not very good. He pulled out a tie at the end.

By: idgaf on 12/31/69 at 7:00

If Palin does well tommorrow night McCain needs to step aside and let someone with real exectutive experience take over.

By: Y_B_Tittle on 12/31/69 at 7:00

Frank, please buy a spelling dictionary.

By: RTungsten on 12/31/69 at 7:00

Y_B, are not all dictionaries "spelling dictionaries"?

By: Y_B_Tittle on 12/31/69 at 7:00

No, a spelling dictionary has no defintions. Frank makes up his own definitions.

By: Y_B_Tittle on 12/31/69 at 7:00

Yes Barr is running for President and no he hasn't dropped out. You have to wonder about some of these posters.

By: WickedTribe on 12/31/69 at 7:00

McCain has pretty much firmly lost OH, PA, and FL going by the newest Quinnipiac polls. Dead in the water, yes. :)

By: revo-lou on 12/31/69 at 7:00

A lot can happen in 30 some odd days. I will be so glad when this is past us.

By: idgaf on 12/31/69 at 7:00

By: Time for Truth on 10/1/08 id, in the last election, you called Kerry and Edwards the #1 and #4 liberals. Do you publish your rankings? Or just get them from Rush Pillbaugh?****************************Actually I didn't but they did lose didn't they.Obama is even left of Kerry.

By: frank brown on 12/31/69 at 7:00

Y.B. why don't you spell the incorrect "word" for me?

By: Y_B_Tittle on 12/31/69 at 7:00

I was refering to IDGAF. His real name is Frank.

By: Time for Truth on 12/31/69 at 7:00

id, so that would make Kerry the #2 liberal?Amazing that we are still debating the same old stuff after four years.....YB, I'm pretty sure id's name isn't Frank.

By: frank brown on 12/31/69 at 7:00

My apologies to Y.B. Tittle

By: Y_B_Tittle on 12/31/69 at 7:00

Yes Id's name is Frank. He has letters published here all the time.

By: Y_B_Tittle on 12/31/69 at 7:00

Frank Briamonte. His last letter to be published was praising the selection of Sarah Palin.

By: Time for Truth on 12/31/69 at 7:00

Were there multiple words spelled incorrectly?

By: abrahamlincoln on 12/31/69 at 7:00

the republicans have ruin our economy, even with all that so call experience republican john mccain has it didn`t do any good, all the republicans do is blame other people for the problems they created and spend big government money, why! there acting like democrates.