DEAR AMY: Last year I became friends with a woman at work who, like me, was pregnant. We hung out a few times, and when I visited her house, I was shocked. Amy, I am not a neat freak, but I have never been anywhere so filthy.
Her house was like an episode of "Hoarders." Every surface — even the stairs — was covered in random papers, trash, dirty dishes, clothes, boxes, recycling and so forth. In many rooms, the trash was 2 feet deep and covered the entire floor. You had to wade through it. I said nothing.
Since then, we have both had our babies, and she has been asking to get together. She brought her baby to my house once, but now she is insistent that we must come to her.
She has called me five times in six days asking when we will come over, each time becoming more insistent.
Amy, I do not want to bring my daughter there because I believe it is a health hazard. I have suggested that we meet at places like the library, but she keeps asking us to come over. I don't know how to tell her that I cannot bring my infant daughter over to play in a trash heap. I also wonder if I should call Child Protective Services because this environment is also dangerous for her baby.
How would you suggest I deal with this?
— Not a Neat Freak
DEAR NOT: I wonder if this other mom is so insistent on having you over because she has cleaned up her home. I certainly hope so.
You can only find out by going. Choose a day when the weather is fine and you can keep the babies outside if necessary. If her house is merely messy (even very messy), don't worry about it. If it is still a trash heap like before and very obviously a physical and biohazard, you should call CPS and ask for guidance.
Reporting a parent to Child Protective Services is a decision not to be taken lightly. Be prepared to answer questions with detailed descriptions of the hazard. If in your considered judgment this is a dangerous environment for the child, you should place the call. The household could be offered support services to maintain a healthier home.
DEAR AMY: I've been in a long-distance relationship for a little over a year now. Things are pretty good, with the exception of one small problem. I want my boyfriend to change his status on Facebook from "single" to either "in a relationship" or simply listing no status.
He claims that he wants his privacy. He says that Facebook isn't real life.
I think part of the problem may be that we dated in college and I dumped him but he told his friends that he dumped me, and now he doesn't want to admit publicly that he's dating me. My boyfriend claims that he's told his friends and his family about us and it really is just about maintaining privacy on the Internet.
Am I being unreasonable?
— Long-Distance Gal
DEAR GAL: Let's sidestep the question about how reasonable you are being and focus on the magnitude of your problem. It's petty.
As long as you and your guy define your current relationship in terms of who dumped whom the last time you broke up, you will continue to barter about his Facebook status.
Imagine that you live in a world where what really matters is the reality of your actual feelings for each other and the personal regard you hold for each other, Facebook status aside. Imagine that you don't care about his social network status. And then don't care.
DEAR AMY: "Brokenhearted" reported that she was completely devastated because her live-in boyfriend was texting another woman. She was freaking out about this, and yet she didn't even mention the content of the text messages. I mean, what if they were completely innocent or work-related? What an overreaction!
DEAR DISAPPOINTED: You are right — the content of these messages was not disclosed. Based on the level of distress reported by "Brokenhearted," I assumed the worst. In the absence of any evidence, this may have been a mistake.
Send questions via e-mail to firstname.lastname@example.org. Amy Dickinson's memoir, The Mighty Queens of Freeville: A Mother, a Daughter and the Town that Raised Them (Hyperion), is available in bookstores.